PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CAMMX vs. RSINX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CAMMX vs. RSINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cambiar SMID Fund (CAMMX) and Victory RS Investors Fund (RSINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CAMMX achieves a 18.17% return, which is significantly higher than RSINX's 14.37% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CAMMX having a 10.49% annualized return and RSINX not far ahead at 10.87%.


CAMMX

1D
-0.65%
1M
1.02%
6M
13.82%
YTD
18.17%
1Y
22.64%
3Y*
6.34%
5Y*
4.72%
10Y*
10.49%
ALL TIME*
9.39%

RSINX

1D
2.11%
1M
4.78%
6M
10.55%
YTD
14.37%
1Y
23.67%
3Y*
15.63%
5Y*
11.69%
10Y*
10.87%
ALL TIME*
8.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

CAMMX vs. RSINX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CAMMX
Cambiar SMID Fund
18.17%0.08%-1.42%12.93%-6.07%23.32%9.60%31.00%-2.68%11.77%
RSINX
Victory RS Investors Fund
14.37%6.39%20.81%13.18%-2.02%25.73%-1.68%28.02%-9.55%16.36%

Correlation

The correlation between CAMMX and RSINX is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2011

0.87

The correlation between CAMMX and RSINX shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.87 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CAMMX vs. RSINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CAMMX
CAMMX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
CAMMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAMMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAMMX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
CAMMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAMMX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

RSINX
RSINX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
RSINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSINX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
RSINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSINX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CAMMX vs. RSINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambiar SMID Fund (CAMMX) and Victory RS Investors Fund (RSINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CAMMXRSINXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.30

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.05

2.42

-0.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.75

8.76

-3.01

CAMMX vs. RSINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CAMMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is comparable to the RSINX Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CAMMX and RSINX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CAMMX vs. RSINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAMMX drawdown since its inception was -41.94%, smaller than the maximum RSINX drawdown of -66.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAMMX and RSINX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CAMMXRSINXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.94%

-66.11%

+24.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.49%

-8.64%

-0.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.75%

-20.23%

-1.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.75%

-23.08%

+1.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.94%

-40.86%

-1.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.79%

0.00%

-1.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.91%

-10.49%

+4.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.39%

2.39%

+1.00%

Volatility

CAMMX vs. RSINX - Volatility Comparison

Cambiar SMID Fund (CAMMX) has a higher volatility of 3.88% compared to Victory RS Investors Fund (RSINX) at 3.43%. This indicates that CAMMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CAMMXRSINXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.88%

3.43%

+0.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.08%

8.15%

+2.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.19%

12.03%

+3.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.96%

18.99%

-2.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.68%

19.06%

-0.38%

CAMMX vs. RSINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CAMMX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is lower than RSINX's 1.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

CAMMX vs. RSINX - Dividend Comparison

CAMMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 29.24%, more than RSINX's 3.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CAMMX
Cambiar SMID Fund
29.24%34.55%6.10%0.70%0.95%11.52%0.61%4.08%6.83%0.39%0.53%0.31%
RSINX
Victory RS Investors Fund
3.90%4.46%10.21%0.77%4.03%15.89%0.30%4.32%17.89%14.37%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CAMMX and RSINX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CAMMX has higher volatility (3.88%) compared to RSINX (3.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CAMMX dropped -41.94% vs RSINX's -66.11%.

RSINX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CAMMX and RSINX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer