CAM vs. LRGC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CAM (AB California Intermediate Municipal ETF) and LRGC (AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CAM is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by AllianceBernstein, while LRGC is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by AllianceBernstein. Both are actively managed. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CAM charges 0.27%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for LRGC.

Performance

CAM vs. LRGC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB California Intermediate Municipal ETF (CAM) and AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF (LRGC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CAM achieves a 1.29% return, which is significantly lower than LRGC's 7.44% return.

CAM

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.60%
• YTD: 1.29%
• 6M: 1.75%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LRGC

• 1D: -0.67%
• 1M: 3.05%
• YTD: 7.44%
• 6M: 7.71%
• 1Y: 23.67%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CAM vs. LRGC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CAM AB California Intermediate Municipal ETF	1.29%	1.17%
LRGC AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF	7.44%	0.79%

Correlation

The correlation between CAM and LRGC is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2025	0.22

Return for Risk

CAM vs. LRGC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LRGC

LRGC Risk / Return Rank: 57
LRGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
LRGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
LRGC Omega Ratio Rank: 59
LRGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
LRGC Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CAM vs. LRGC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB California Intermediate Municipal ETF (CAM) and AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF (LRGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CAM	LRGC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.00	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.80	1.45	+0.35

Drawdowns

CAM vs. LRGC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAM drawdown since its inception was -2.19%, smaller than the maximum LRGC drawdown of -19.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAM and LRGC.

Drawdown Indicators

	CAM	LRGC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.19%	-19.38%	+17.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-10.00%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.58%	-0.67%	+0.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.51%	-2.15%	+1.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.40%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CAM	LRGC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.91%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	9.09%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.12%	11.88%	-9.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.12%	15.20%	-13.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.12%	15.20%	-13.08%

CAM vs. LRGC - Expense Ratio Comparison

CAM has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is lower than LRGC's 0.48% expense ratio.

Dividends

CAM vs. LRGC - Dividend Comparison

CAM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%, more than LRGC's 0.54% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CAM AB California Intermediate Municipal ETF	2.25%	0.87%	0.00%	0.00%
LRGC AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF	0.54%	0.58%	0.46%	0.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CAM and LRGC in my portfolio?

CAM and LRGC have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CAM or LRGC?

On fees, CAM is cheaper at 0.27% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CAM or LRGC?

CAM is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for LRGC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CAM or LRGC?

CAM has the higher dividend yield at 2.25%, compared with 0.54% for LRGC.

What is the main difference between CAM and LRGC?

CAM is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while LRGC is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for CAM and 0.48% for LRGC.