CALF vs. RB

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

CALF (Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF) and RB (ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CALF is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Index, while RB is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Russell 2000. Both are passively managed. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CALF charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for RB.

Performance

CALF vs. RB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF) and ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (RB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CALF achieves a 10.59% return, which is significantly higher than RB's 8.48% return.

CALF

• 1D: -0.51%
• 1M: 0.44%
• YTD: 10.59%
• 6M: 8.95%
• 1Y: 25.83%
• 3Y*: 9.33%
• 5Y*: 3.73%
• 10Y*: —

RB

• 1D: 0.70%
• 1M: 1.98%
• YTD: 8.48%
• 6M: 8.15%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CALF vs. RB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CALF Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF	10.59%	14.04%
RB ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF	8.48%	10.85%

Correlation

The correlation between CALF and RB is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025	0.56

Return for Risk

CALF vs. RB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CALF

CALF Risk / Return Rank: 58
CALF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
CALF Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
CALF Omega Ratio Rank: 46
CALF Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
CALF Martin Ratio Rank: 65

RB

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CALF vs. RB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF) and ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (RB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CALF	RB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.62	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.37	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.22	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.59	—	—

Drawdowns

CALF vs. RB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CALF drawdown since its inception was -47.58%, which is greater than RB's maximum drawdown of -2.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CALF and RB.

Drawdown Indicators

	CALF	RB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.58%	-2.09%	-45.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.15%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-34.22%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.22%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.33%	0.00%	-4.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.69%	-0.44%	-10.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.23%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CALF	RB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.39%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.92%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.05%	6.56%	+9.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.39%	6.56%	+16.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.97%	6.56%	+19.41%

CALF vs. RB - Expense Ratio Comparison

CALF has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than RB's 0.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

CALF vs. RB - Dividend Comparison

CALF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, less than RB's 1.96% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CALF Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF	1.24%	1.43%	1.07%	1.18%	0.85%	2.63%	0.82%	0.99%	1.39%	0.70%
RB ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF	1.96%	1.78%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CALF and RB in my portfolio?

CALF and RB have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CALF or RB?

On fees, RB is cheaper at 0.58% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CALF or RB?

RB is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for CALF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CALF or RB?

RB has the higher dividend yield at 1.96%, compared with 1.24% for CALF.

What is the main difference between CALF and RB?

CALF is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while RB is Defined Outcome. CALF tracks Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Index, while RB tracks Russell 2000. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for CALF and 0.58% for RB.