CALF vs. DEEP
CALF (Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF) and DEEP (Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CALF is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Index, while DEEP is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the DEEP-US - Acquirers Deep Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CALF returned 4.12%/yr vs 3.74%/yr for DEEP. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CALF charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for DEEP.
Performance
CALF vs. DEEP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CALF achieves a 13.34% return, which is significantly higher than DEEP's 12.39% return.
CALF
- 1D
- -1.12%
- 1M
- 4.91%
- YTD
- 13.34%
- 6M
- 12.53%
- 1Y
- 30.24%
- 3Y*
- 10.69%
- 5Y*
- 4.12%
- 10Y*
- —
DEEP
- 1D
- -2.02%
- 1M
- 0.72%
- YTD
- 12.39%
- 6M
- 11.91%
- 1Y
- 27.76%
- 3Y*
- 9.78%
- 5Y*
- 3.74%
- 10Y*
- 8.15%
CALF vs. DEEP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CALF Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF | 13.34% | 2.33% | -7.41% | 35.43% | -15.20% | 40.68% | 16.55% | 18.18% | -10.06% | 5.78% |
DEEP Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF | 12.39% | 5.69% | -2.97% | 22.37% | -17.71% | 35.66% | -9.96% | 12.54% | -7.17% | 18.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between CALF and DEEP is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2017 | 0.86 |
The correlation between CALF and DEEP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
CALF vs. DEEP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CALF
DEEP
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Healthcare
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Financial Services
Utilities
-
-
Technology
CALF
DEEP
Consumer Cyclical
CALF
DEEP
Energy
CALF
DEEP
Healthcare
CALF
DEEP
Communication Services
CALF
DEEP
Industrials
CALF
DEEP
Consumer Defensive
CALF
DEEP
Real Estate
CALF
DEEP
Basic Materials
CALF
DEEP
Financial Services
CALF
DEEP
Utilities
CALF
-
DEEP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CALF vs. DEEP — Risk / Return Rank
CALF
DEEP
CALF vs. DEEP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF) and Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF (DEEP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CALF | DEEP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.25 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.94 | 2.35 | +2.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.08 | 6.76 | +7.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CALF | DEEP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.93 | 1.46 | +0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 | 0.17 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.34 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.29 | +0.08 |
Drawdowns
CALF vs. DEEP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CALF drawdown since its inception was -47.58%, smaller than the maximum DEEP drawdown of -52.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CALF and DEEP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CALF | DEEP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.58% | -52.52% | +4.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.15% | -11.87% | +5.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.22% | -28.40% | -5.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.22% | -28.40% | -5.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -52.52% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.95% | -2.02% | +0.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.74% | -10.40% | -0.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.15% | 4.12% | -1.97% |
Volatility
CALF vs. DEEP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF) is 4.92%, while Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF (DEEP) has a volatility of 5.67%. This indicates that CALF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DEEP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CALF | DEEP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.92% | 5.67% | -0.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.47% | 12.29% | -1.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.84% | 19.18% | -3.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.44% | 21.65% | +1.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.02% | 24.27% | +1.75% |
CALF vs. DEEP - Expense Ratio Comparison
CALF has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than DEEP's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
CALF vs. DEEP - Dividend Comparison
CALF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, less than DEEP's 1.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CALF Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF | 1.28% | 1.43% | 1.07% | 1.18% | 0.85% | 2.63% | 0.82% | 0.99% | 1.39% | 0.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DEEP Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF | 1.52% | 1.78% | 1.96% | 1.67% | 1.28% | 1.43% | 4.03% | 3.49% | 1.51% | 2.01% | 3.14% | 3.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CALF and DEEP have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DEEP has higher volatility (5.67%) compared to CALF (4.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CALF dropped -47.58% vs DEEP's -52.52%.
On 5-year performance, CALF leads with 4.12% vs 3.74% for DEEP. On fees, CALF is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, CALF has been the lower-risk option at 4.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, CALF has performed better with a 4.12% return vs 3.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CALF is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for DEEP.
DEEP has the higher dividend yield at 1.52%, compared with 1.28% for CALF.
CALF is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while DEEP is Small Cap Value Equities. CALF tracks Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Index, while DEEP tracks DEEP-US - Acquirers Deep Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for CALF and 0.80% for DEEP.
CALF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CALF and DEEP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer