CAIQ vs. XLK
CAIQ (Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF) and XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CAIQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the MerQube Nasdaq-100 Vol Advantage Autocallable Index, while XLK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CAIQ charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLK.
Performance
CAIQ vs. XLK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CAIQ achieves a 12.96% return, which is significantly lower than XLK's 33.38% return.
CAIQ
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- 1.36%
- YTD
- 12.96%
- 6M
- 14.11%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLK
- 1D
- 3.78%
- 1M
- 8.81%
- YTD
- 33.38%
- 6M
- 35.15%
- 1Y
- 61.29%
- 3Y*
- 31.25%
- 5Y*
- 22.96%
- 10Y*
- 25.75%
CAIQ vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CAIQ Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF | 12.96% | 4.03% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 33.38% | 2.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between CAIQ and XLK is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2025 | 0.85 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CAIQ vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank
CAIQ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
XLK
CAIQ vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF (CAIQ) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CAIQ | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.44 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.87 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 12.48 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CAIQ vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CAIQ drawdown since its inception was -9.06%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAIQ and XLK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CAIQ | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.06% | -82.05% | +72.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -15.92% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -25.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.56% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.52% | -3.24% | +2.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.70% | -34.92% | +33.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.92% | — |
Volatility
CAIQ vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CAIQ | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 11.35% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 19.24% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.91% | 22.81% | -8.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.91% | 25.24% | -11.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.91% | 24.68% | -10.77% |
CAIQ vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison
CAIQ has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than XLK's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
CAIQ vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison
CAIQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.50%, more than XLK's 0.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAIQ Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF | 8.50% | 1.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.40% | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.76% | 1.04% | 0.65% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 1.74% | 1.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CAIQ and XLK have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLK is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLK is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for CAIQ.
CAIQ has the higher dividend yield at 8.50%, compared with 0.40% for XLK.
CAIQ is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while XLK is Technology Equities. CAIQ tracks MerQube Nasdaq-100 Vol Advantage Autocallable Index, while XLK tracks S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. They also come from different issuers: Calamos and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for CAIQ and 0.08% for XLK.
Find the right allocation for CAIQ and XLK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer