CAIQ vs. SCHD
CAIQ (Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF) and SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CAIQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the MerQube Nasdaq-100 Vol Advantage Autocallable Index, while SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CAIQ charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHD.
Performance
CAIQ vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CAIQ achieves a 12.96% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 19.96% return.
CAIQ
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- 1.36%
- YTD
- 12.96%
- 6M
- 14.11%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHD
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 2.87%
- YTD
- 19.96%
- 6M
- 18.54%
- 1Y
- 25.99%
- 3Y*
- 14.28%
- 5Y*
- 8.90%
- 10Y*
- 12.83%
CAIQ vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CAIQ Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF | 12.96% | 4.03% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 19.96% | 2.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between CAIQ and SCHD is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2025 | 0.17 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CAIQ vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
CAIQ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SCHD
CAIQ vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF (CAIQ) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CAIQ | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.43 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 5.66 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 13.87 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CAIQ vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CAIQ drawdown since its inception was -9.06%, smaller than the maximum SCHD drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAIQ and SCHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CAIQ | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.06% | -33.37% | +24.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -4.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.13% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.52% | -0.61% | +0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.70% | -3.31% | +1.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.88% | — |
Volatility
CAIQ vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CAIQ | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.14% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.56% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.91% | 10.94% | +2.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.91% | 14.39% | -0.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.91% | 16.72% | -2.81% |
CAIQ vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
CAIQ has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
CAIQ vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
CAIQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.50%, more than SCHD's 3.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAIQ Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF | 8.50% | 1.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.24% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CAIQ and SCHD have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for CAIQ.
CAIQ has the higher dividend yield at 8.50%, compared with 3.24% for SCHD.
CAIQ is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while SCHD is Dividend. CAIQ tracks MerQube Nasdaq-100 Vol Advantage Autocallable Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Calamos and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for CAIQ and 0.06% for SCHD.
Find the right allocation for CAIQ and SCHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer