CAIQ vs. PBP

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF (CAIQ) and Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (PBP).

CAIQ and PBP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CAIQ is a passively managed fund by Calamos that tracks the performance of the MerQube Nasdaq-100 Vol Advantage Autocallable Index. It was launched on Nov 20, 2024. PBP is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2007. Both CAIQ and PBP are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

CAIQ vs. PBP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF (CAIQ) and Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (PBP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CAIQ vs. PBP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CAIQ Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF	-2.89%	4.03%
PBP Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF	-0.63%	4.43%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CAIQ achieves a -2.89% return, which is significantly lower than PBP's -0.63% return.

CAIQ

• 1D: 1.33%
• 1M: -2.45%
• YTD: -2.89%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PBP

• 1D: 0.41%
• 1M: -2.60%
• YTD: -0.63%
• 6M: 5.67%
• 1Y: 11.15%
• 3Y*: 10.89%
• 5Y*: 7.57%
• 10Y*: 6.74%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CAIQ vs. PBP - Expense Ratio Comparison

CAIQ has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than PBP's 0.29% expense ratio.

CAIQ

Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF

PBP

Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF

Return for Risk

CAIQ vs. PBP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBP

PBP Risk / Return Rank: 50
PBP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
PBP Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
PBP Omega Ratio Rank: 64
PBP Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
PBP Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CAIQ vs. PBP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF (CAIQ) and Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (PBP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CAIQ	PBP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.79	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.64	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.49	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.21	0.33	-0.12

Correlation

The correlation between CAIQ and PBP is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

CAIQ vs. PBP - Dividend Comparison

CAIQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.43%, less than PBP's 11.58% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CAIQ Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF	6.43%	1.54%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PBP Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF	11.58%	11.12%	9.36%	3.35%	1.33%	6.21%	1.41%	5.04%	2.59%	10.86%	2.56%	6.19%

Drawdowns

CAIQ vs. PBP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAIQ drawdown since its inception was -9.06%, smaller than the maximum PBP drawdown of -43.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAIQ and PBP.

Drawdown Indicators

	CAIQ	PBP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.06%	-43.43%	+34.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-10.20%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-18.61%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.31%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.07%	-2.89%	-2.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.21%	-6.75%	+4.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.80%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CAIQ	PBP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.10%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	5.98%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.25%	14.26%	-0.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.25%	11.95%	+2.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.25%	13.68%	+0.57%