PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CAIE vs. CAGE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CAIE vs. CAGE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Autocallable Income ETF (CAIE) and Calamos Autocallable Growth ETF (CAGE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


CAIE

1D
1.30%
1M
2.49%
6M
9.84%
YTD
10.88%
1Y
20.78%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
24.63%

CAGE

1D
3.40%
1M
5.64%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.54M$3.19M$2.74M
$18.08M$16.26M$13.42M

CAIE vs. CAGE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CAIE and CAGE is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2026

0.94

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CAIE vs. CAGE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CAIE
CAIE Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
CAIE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAIE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAIE Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
CAIE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAIE Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

CAGE

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CAIE vs. CAGE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Autocallable Income ETF (CAIE) and Calamos Autocallable Growth ETF (CAGE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CAIECAGEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.39

CAIE vs. CAGE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CAIE vs. CAGE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAIE drawdown since its inception was -7.73%, which is greater than CAGE's maximum drawdown of -6.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAIE and CAGE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CAIECAGEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.73%

-6.67%

-1.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.13%

-2.00%

+0.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.83%

Volatility

CAIE vs. CAGE - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CAIECAGEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.94%

22.46%

-10.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.92%

22.46%

-10.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.92%

22.46%

-10.54%

CAIE vs. CAGE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CAIE has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than CAGE's 0.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

CAIE vs. CAGE - Dividend Comparison

CAIE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.08%, while CAGE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025
CAGE
Calamos Autocallable Growth ETF
0.00%0.00%
CAIE
Calamos Autocallable Income ETF
14.08%7.46%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, CAIE and CAGE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, CAGE is cheaper at 0.74% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CAGE is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for CAIE.

CAIE has the higher dividend yield at 14.08%, compared with 0.00% for CAGE.

CAIE is categorized as Derivative Income, while CAGE is Defined Outcome. Their fees differ too: 0.86% for CAIE and 0.74% for CAGE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CAIE and CAGE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer