PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CAFX vs. USFI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CAFX vs. USFI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Congress Intermediate Bond ETF (CAFX) and BrandywineGLOBAL - U.S. Fixed Income ETF (USFI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CAFX achieves a -0.07% return, which is significantly lower than USFI's 0.56% return.


CAFX

1D
-0.12%
1M
-0.55%
6M
-0.16%
YTD
-0.07%
1Y
1.77%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.51%

USFI

1D
-0.06%
1M
-0.83%
6M
0.47%
YTD
0.56%
1Y
2.86%
3Y*
3.91%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$652.76K$602.99K$771.28K
$231.12$248.47$6.98K

CAFX vs. USFI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
CAFX
Congress Intermediate Bond ETF
-0.07%6.46%-1.50%
USFI
BrandywineGLOBAL - U.S. Fixed Income ETF
0.56%6.96%-4.07%

Correlation

The correlation between CAFX and USFI is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2024

0.75

The correlation between CAFX and USFI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CAFX vs. USFI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CAFX
CAFX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
CAFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAFX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
CAFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAFX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

USFI
USFI Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
USFI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USFI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
USFI Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
USFI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
USFI Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CAFX vs. USFI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Congress Intermediate Bond ETF (CAFX) and BrandywineGLOBAL - U.S. Fixed Income ETF (USFI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CAFXUSFIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.22

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.42

3.46

-2.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.51

8.04

-4.54

CAFX vs. USFI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CAFX Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is comparable to the USFI Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CAFX and USFI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CAFX vs. USFI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAFX drawdown since its inception was -2.63%, smaller than the maximum USFI drawdown of -8.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAFX and USFI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CAFXUSFIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.63%

-8.47%

+5.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.79%

-1.11%

-0.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.27%

-1.00%

-0.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.75%

-2.06%

+1.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.72%

0.47%

+0.25%

Volatility

CAFX vs. USFI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Congress Intermediate Bond ETF (CAFX) is 0.65%, while BrandywineGLOBAL - U.S. Fixed Income ETF (USFI) has a volatility of 0.74%. This indicates that CAFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USFI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CAFXUSFIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.65%

0.74%

-0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.00%

1.66%

+0.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.87%

3.20%

-0.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.12%

6.84%

-3.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.12%

6.84%

-3.72%

CAFX vs. USFI - Expense Ratio Comparison

CAFX has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than USFI's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

CAFX vs. USFI - Dividend Comparison

CAFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.07%, less than USFI's 4.46% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
CAFX
Congress Intermediate Bond ETF
4.07%3.92%0.96%0.00%
USFI
BrandywineGLOBAL - U.S. Fixed Income ETF
4.04%4.42%4.60%1.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


CAFX and USFI have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USFI has higher volatility (0.74%) compared to CAFX (0.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CAFX dropped -2.63% vs USFI's -8.47%.

On 1-year performance, USFI leads with 2.86% vs 1.77% for CAFX. On fees, CAFX is cheaper at 0.35% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, USFI has performed better with a 2.86% return vs 1.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CAFX is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for USFI.

CAFX has the higher dividend yield at 4.07%, compared with 4.04% for USFI.

CAFX is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while USFI is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: Congress and BrandywineGLOBAL. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CAFX and 0.39% for USFI.

USFI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CAFX and USFI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer