CAEM.TO vs. SMH
CAEM.TO (Avantis CIBC Emerging Markets Equity ETF) and SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CAEM.TO is a Emerging Markets Equities fund actively managed by CIBC, while SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. CAEM.TO is actively managed, while SMH is passively managed. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
CAEM.TO vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CAEM.TO is traded in CAD, while SMH is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SMH values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
CAEM.TO
- 1D
- -4.49%
- 1M
- 4.98%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMH
- 1D
- -7.11%
- 1M
- 10.93%
- YTD
- 78.58%
- 6M
- 76.39%
- 1Y
- 145.50%
- 3Y*
- 66.35%
- 5Y*
- 42.11%
- 10Y*
- 39.21%
CAEM.TO vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CAEM.TO Avantis CIBC Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 19.32% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 74.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between CAEM.TO and SMH is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2026 | 0.79 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CAEM.TO vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
CAEM.TO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SMH
CAEM.TO vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis CIBC Emerging Markets Equity ETF (CAEM.TO) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CAEM.TO | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.60 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 10.69 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 37.27 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CAEM.TO vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CAEM.TO drawdown since its inception was -6.26%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -65.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAEM.TO and SMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CAEM.TO | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.26% | -65.72% | +59.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.69% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -33.72% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -41.26% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.26% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.49% | -7.11% | +2.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.17% | -19.92% | +18.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.92% | — |
Volatility
CAEM.TO vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CAEM.TO | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 19.44% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 29.47% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.43% | 35.06% | -9.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.43% | 36.42% | -10.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.43% | 33.75% | -8.32% |
Dividends
CAEM.TO vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
CAEM.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAEM.TO Avantis CIBC Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.18% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CAEM.TO and SMH have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CAEM.TO is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while SMH is Semiconductors. They also come from different issuers: CIBC and VanEck.
Find the right allocation for CAEM.TO and SMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer