CAEM.TO vs. CSBG.NEO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CAEM.TO (Avantis CIBC Emerging Markets Equity ETF) and CSBG.NEO (CIBC Sustainable Balanced Growth Solution ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CAEM.TO is a Emerging Markets Equities fund actively managed by CIBC, while CSBG.NEO is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by CIBC. Both are actively managed.

Performance

CAEM.TO vs. CSBG.NEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Avantis CIBC Emerging Markets Equity ETF (CAEM.TO) and CIBC Sustainable Balanced Growth Solution ETF (CSBG.NEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CAEM.TO

• 1D: -0.87%
• 1M: 9.77%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CSBG.NEO

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 6M: 0.00%
• 1Y: 0.00%
• 3Y*: 0.80%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CAEM.TO vs. CSBG.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CAEM.TO Avantis CIBC Emerging Markets Equity ETF	17.42%
CSBG.NEO CIBC Sustainable Balanced Growth Solution ETF	0.00%

Return for Risk

CAEM.TO vs. CSBG.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis CIBC Emerging Markets Equity ETF (CAEM.TO) and CIBC Sustainable Balanced Growth Solution ETF (CSBG.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CAEM.TO	CSBG.NEO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	7.86	1.08	+6.78

Drawdowns

CAEM.TO vs. CSBG.NEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAEM.TO drawdown since its inception was -4.26%, which is greater than CSBG.NEO's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAEM.TO and CSBG.NEO.

Drawdown Indicators

	CAEM.TO	CSBG.NEO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.26%	0.00%	-4.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	0.00%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	0.00%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.87%	0.00%	-0.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.74%	0.00%	-0.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.00%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CAEM.TO	CSBG.NEO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.00%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	0.00%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.42%	0.00%	+19.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.42%	1.27%	+18.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.42%	1.27%	+18.15%

Dividends

CAEM.TO vs. CSBG.NEO - Dividend Comparison

Neither CAEM.TO nor CSBG.NEO has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
CAEM.TO Avantis CIBC Emerging Markets Equity ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CSBG.NEO CIBC Sustainable Balanced Growth Solution ETF	0.00%	0.00%	1.16%	1.21%	1.66%

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the main difference between CAEM.TO and CSBG.NEO?

CAEM.TO is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while CSBG.NEO is Diversified Portfolio.