CAEIX vs. YFSNX
CAEIX (Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund) and YFSNX (AMG Yacktman Global Fund Class N) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, CAEIX returned 3.84%/yr vs 8.93%/yr for YFSNX. Their 0.72 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. CAEIX charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.11%/yr for YFSNX.
Performance
CAEIX vs. YFSNX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CAEIX achieves a 11.37% return, which is significantly lower than YFSNX's 25.34% return.
CAEIX
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- -2.99%
- 6M
- 4.43%
- YTD
- 11.37%
- 1Y
- 25.28%
- 3Y*
- 8.88%
- 5Y*
- 3.84%
- 10Y*
- 10.96%
- ALL TIME*
- 1.09%
YFSNX
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- 4.71%
- 6M
- 16.53%
- YTD
- 25.34%
- 1Y
- 22.75%
- 3Y*
- 15.16%
- 5Y*
- 8.93%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.70%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
CAEIX vs. YFSNX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAEIX Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund | 11.37% | 32.61% | -7.13% | 5.67% | -17.43% | 6.73% | 61.52% | 33.48% | -19.26% | 24.63% |
YFSNX AMG Yacktman Global Fund Class N | 25.34% | 14.79% | -0.47% | 16.48% | -9.39% | 13.00% | 18.32% | 24.48% | 2.18% | 20.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between CAEIX and YFSNX is 0.57, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2017 | 0.72 |
The correlation between CAEIX and YFSNX shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.72 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CAEIX vs. YFSNX — Risk / Return Rank
CAEIX
YFSNX
CAEIX vs. YFSNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund (CAEIX) and AMG Yacktman Global Fund Class N (YFSNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CAEIX | YFSNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.23 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.06 | 1.54 | +0.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.54 | 4.46 | +2.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CAEIX vs. YFSNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CAEIX drawdown since its inception was -75.81%, which is greater than YFSNX's maximum drawdown of -35.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAEIX and YFSNX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CAEIX | YFSNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.81% | -35.14% | -40.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.97% | -14.09% | +2.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.01% | -14.29% | -7.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.58% | -25.26% | -7.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.54% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.53% | -2.18% | -7.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -48.27% | -4.94% | -43.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.77% | 4.84% | -1.07% |
Volatility
CAEIX vs. YFSNX - Volatility Comparison
Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund (CAEIX) and AMG Yacktman Global Fund Class N (YFSNX) have volatilities of 5.20% and 5.40%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CAEIX | YFSNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.20% | 5.40% | -0.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.74% | 15.88% | -1.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.87% | 22.56% | -4.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.41% | 15.76% | +3.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.56% | 16.35% | +3.21% |
CAEIX vs. YFSNX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CAEIX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than YFSNX's 1.11% expense ratio.
Dividends
CAEIX vs. YFSNX - Dividend Comparison
CAEIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, while YFSNX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAEIX Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund | 0.65% | 0.72% | 1.17% | 1.07% | 0.86% | 0.49% | 0.82% | 1.23% | 2.00% | 1.40% | 1.79% | 0.72% |
YFSNX AMG Yacktman Global Fund Class N | 0.00% | 0.00% | 8.40% | 7.86% | 4.33% | 8.06% | 4.71% | 6.59% | 0.71% | 2.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CAEIX and YFSNX have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
YFSNX has higher volatility (5.40%) compared to CAEIX (5.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CAEIX dropped -75.81% vs YFSNX's -35.14%.
CAEIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CAEIX and YFSNX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer