PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CAEIX vs. CISIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CAEIX vs. CISIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund (CAEIX) and Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index Fund (CISIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CAEIX having a 11.37% return and CISIX slightly higher at 11.89%. Over the past 10 years, CAEIX has underperformed CISIX with an annualized return of 10.96%, while CISIX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.19% annualized return.


CAEIX

1D
-0.13%
1M
-2.99%
6M
4.43%
YTD
11.37%
1Y
25.28%
3Y*
8.88%
5Y*
3.84%
10Y*
10.96%
ALL TIME*
1.09%

CISIX

1D
0.55%
1M
-0.10%
6M
9.77%
YTD
11.89%
1Y
23.36%
3Y*
19.20%
5Y*
11.57%
10Y*
15.19%
ALL TIME*
7.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

CAEIX vs. CISIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CAEIX
Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund
11.37%32.61%-7.13%5.67%-17.43%6.73%61.52%33.48%-19.26%29.65%
CISIX
Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index Fund
11.89%15.90%24.14%27.27%-21.68%25.63%26.12%32.81%-4.08%21.18%

Correlation

The correlation between CAEIX and CISIX is 0.80, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 31, 2007

0.77

The correlation between CAEIX and CISIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CAEIX vs. CISIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CAEIX
CAEIX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
CAEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
CAEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

CISIX
CISIX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
CISIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CISIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
CISIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
CISIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
CISIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CAEIX vs. CISIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund (CAEIX) and Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index Fund (CISIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CAEIXCISIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.28

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.06

2.21

-0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.54

9.74

-3.20

CAEIX vs. CISIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CAEIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is comparable to the CISIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CAEIX and CISIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CAEIX vs. CISIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAEIX drawdown since its inception was -75.81%, which is greater than CISIX's maximum drawdown of -59.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAEIX and CISIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CAEIXCISIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.81%

-59.36%

-16.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.97%

-9.72%

-2.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.01%

-19.94%

-2.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.58%

-27.37%

-5.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.54%

-32.82%

-4.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.53%

-1.07%

-8.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-48.27%

-14.21%

-34.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.77%

2.20%

+1.57%

Volatility

CAEIX vs. CISIX - Volatility Comparison

Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund (CAEIX) has a higher volatility of 5.20% compared to Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index Fund (CISIX) at 3.70%. This indicates that CAEIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CISIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CAEIXCISIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.20%

3.70%

+1.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.74%

10.82%

+3.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.87%

13.54%

+4.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.41%

17.91%

+1.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.56%

18.57%

+0.99%

CAEIX vs. CISIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CAEIX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than CISIX's 0.24% expense ratio.


Dividends

CAEIX vs. CISIX - Dividend Comparison

CAEIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, less than CISIX's 4.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CAEIX
Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund
0.65%0.72%1.17%1.07%0.86%0.49%0.82%1.23%2.00%1.40%1.79%0.72%
CISIX
Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index Fund
4.82%5.39%1.77%1.02%1.17%1.02%0.94%1.14%4.33%2.41%3.77%7.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


CAEIX and CISIX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CAEIX has higher volatility (5.20%) compared to CISIX (3.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CAEIX dropped -75.81% vs CISIX's -59.36%.

CISIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CAEIX and CISIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer