CACX.L vs. SPOL.L
CACX.L (Lyxor CAC 40 (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist) and SPOL.L (iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Europe Equities funds - CACX.L tracks the Euronext Paris CAC 40 NR EUR while SPOL.L tracks the MSCI Poland NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CACX.L returned 10.55%/yr vs 10.28%/yr for SPOL.L. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CACX.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for SPOL.L.
Performance
CACX.L vs. SPOL.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CACX.L achieves a 2.53% return, which is significantly lower than SPOL.L's 15.71% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CACX.L having a 10.55% annualized return and SPOL.L not far behind at 10.28%.
CACX.L
- 1D
- 0.84%
- 1M
- 3.20%
- YTD
- 2.53%
- 6M
- 2.64%
- 1Y
- 11.49%
- 3Y*
- 7.70%
- 5Y*
- 8.00%
- 10Y*
- 10.55%
SPOL.L
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- 6.57%
- YTD
- 15.71%
- 6M
- 25.23%
- 1Y
- 43.43%
- 3Y*
- 30.33%
- 5Y*
- 15.01%
- 10Y*
- 10.28%
CACX.L vs. SPOL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CACX.L Lyxor CAC 40 (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist | 2.53% | 19.60% | -4.39% | 16.83% | -0.56% | 22.14% | 0.79% | 23.85% | -7.71% | 17.11% |
SPOL.L iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 15.71% | 61.27% | -4.98% | 41.52% | -17.96% | 8.30% | -14.19% | -9.68% | -7.69% | 40.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between CACX.L and SPOL.L is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2014 | 0.55 |
The correlation between CACX.L and SPOL.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.
CACX.L vs. SPOL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CACX.L
SPOL.L
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Utilities
Industrials
CACX.L
SPOL.L
Financial Services
CACX.L
SPOL.L
Consumer Cyclical
CACX.L
SPOL.L
Energy
CACX.L
SPOL.L
Healthcare
CACX.L
SPOL.L
-
Consumer Defensive
CACX.L
SPOL.L
Technology
CACX.L
SPOL.L
Communication Services
CACX.L
SPOL.L
Basic Materials
CACX.L
SPOL.L
Real Estate
CACX.L
SPOL.L
-
Utilities
CACX.L
SPOL.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CACX.L vs. SPOL.L — Risk / Return Rank
CACX.L
SPOL.L
CACX.L vs. SPOL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor CAC 40 (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (CACX.L) and iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SPOL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CACX.L | SPOL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.31 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.97 | 4.54 | -3.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.95 | 10.87 | -7.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CACX.L | SPOL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 | 1.87 | -1.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | 0.55 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | 0.40 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.16 | +0.36 |
Drawdowns
CACX.L vs. SPOL.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CACX.L drawdown since its inception was -32.83%, smaller than the maximum SPOL.L drawdown of -56.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CACX.L and SPOL.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CACX.L | SPOL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.83% | -56.64% | +23.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.81% | -9.51% | -2.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.77% | -19.47% | +4.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.36% | -46.27% | +26.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.83% | -56.64% | +23.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.61% | -0.53% | -3.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.30% | -21.79% | +16.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.89% | 3.98% | -0.09% |
Volatility
CACX.L vs. SPOL.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lyxor CAC 40 (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (CACX.L) is 4.87%, while iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SPOL.L) has a volatility of 7.21%. This indicates that CACX.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPOL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CACX.L | SPOL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.87% | 7.21% | -2.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.20% | 17.30% | -6.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.50% | 23.13% | -8.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.71% | 27.10% | -10.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.62% | 25.42% | -7.80% |
CACX.L vs. SPOL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CACX.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than SPOL.L's 0.74% expense ratio.
Dividends
CACX.L vs. SPOL.L - Dividend Comparison
CACX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%, while SPOL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CACX.L Lyxor CAC 40 (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist | 2.83% | 2.90% | 3.00% | 2.78% | 2.54% | 1.95% | 1.66% | 3.03% | 3.70% | 2.94% | 3.49% | 3.46% |
SPOL.L iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CACX.L and SPOL.L have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CACX.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CACX.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for SPOL.L.
CACX.L tracks Euronext Paris CAC 40 NR EUR, while SPOL.L tracks MSCI Poland NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for CACX.L and 0.74% for SPOL.L.
Find the right allocation for CACX.L and SPOL.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer