PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CACX.L vs. BRK-B
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CACX.L vs. BRK-B - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor CAC 40 (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (CACX.L) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CACX.L is traded in GBp, while BRK-B is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BRK-B values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CACX.L achieves a 2.53% return, which is significantly higher than BRK-B's -5.08% return. Over the past 10 years, CACX.L has underperformed BRK-B with an annualized return of 10.55%, while BRK-B has yielded a comparatively higher 13.69% annualized return.


CACX.L

1D
0.84%
1M
3.20%
YTD
2.53%
6M
2.64%
1Y
11.49%
3Y*
7.70%
5Y*
8.00%
10Y*
10.55%

BRK-B

1D
0.00%
1M
3.02%
YTD
-5.08%
6M
-6.22%
1Y
-2.28%
3Y*
10.25%
5Y*
11.38%
10Y*
13.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CACX.L vs. BRK-B - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CACX.L
Lyxor CAC 40 (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist
2.53%19.60%-4.39%16.83%-0.56%22.14%0.79%23.85%-7.71%17.11%
BRK-B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
-4.39%2.99%29.31%9.69%15.59%30.17%-0.64%6.71%9.11%11.10%

Correlation

The correlation between CACX.L and BRK-B is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2014

0.35

Over the past year, the correlation between CACX.L and BRK-B has dropped to 0.10 - well below their long-term average of 0.35, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CACX.L vs. BRK-B — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CACX.L
CACX.L Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
CACX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CACX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
CACX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
CACX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
CACX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

BRK-B
BRK-B Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
BRK-B Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRK-B Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRK-B Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
BRK-B Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRK-B Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CACX.L vs. BRK-B - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor CAC 40 (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (CACX.L) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CACX.LBRK-BDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

0.99

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.97

-0.19

+1.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.95

-0.42

+3.36

CACX.L vs. BRK-B - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CACX.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is higher than the BRK-B Sharpe Ratio of -0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CACX.L and BRK-B, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CACX.LBRK-BDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

-0.15

+0.94

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

0.68

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

0.69

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.59

-0.07

Drawdowns

CACX.L vs. BRK-B - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CACX.L drawdown since its inception was -32.83%, smaller than the maximum BRK-B drawdown of -37.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CACX.L and BRK-B.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CACX.LBRK-BDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.83%

-37.92%

+5.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.81%

-11.88%

+0.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.77%

-17.26%

+2.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.36%

-20.84%

+1.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.83%

-21.44%

-11.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.61%

-14.52%

+10.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.30%

-7.39%

+2.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.89%

5.50%

-1.61%

Volatility

CACX.L vs. BRK-B - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor CAC 40 (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (CACX.L) has a higher volatility of 4.87% compared to Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) at 3.82%. This indicates that CACX.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BRK-B based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CACX.LBRK-BDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.87%

3.82%

+1.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.20%

11.92%

-0.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.50%

15.39%

-0.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.71%

16.89%

-0.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.62%

19.85%

-2.23%

Dividends

CACX.L vs. BRK-B - Dividend Comparison

CACX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%, while BRK-B has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BRK-B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CACX.L
Lyxor CAC 40 (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist
2.83%2.90%3.00%2.78%2.54%1.95%1.66%3.03%3.70%2.94%3.49%3.46%

Frequently Asked Questions


CACX.L and BRK-B have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CACX.L and BRK-B

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer