CACX.L vs. PRUK.L
CACX.L (Lyxor CAC 40 (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist) and PRUK.L (Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D)) are both Europe Equities funds from Amundi - CACX.L tracks the Euronext Paris CAC 40 NR EUR while PRUK.L tracks the FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CACX.L returned 8.00%/yr vs 0.76%/yr for PRUK.L. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CACX.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for PRUK.L.
Performance
CACX.L vs. PRUK.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CACX.L achieves a 2.53% return, which is significantly lower than PRUK.L's 2.88% return.
CACX.L
- 1D
- 0.84%
- 1M
- 3.20%
- YTD
- 2.53%
- 6M
- 2.64%
- 1Y
- 11.49%
- 3Y*
- 7.70%
- 5Y*
- 8.00%
- 10Y*
- 10.55%
PRUK.L
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- 3.43%
- YTD
- 2.88%
- 6M
- 5.16%
- 1Y
- 9.91%
- 3Y*
- 8.92%
- 5Y*
- 0.76%
- 10Y*
- —
CACX.L vs. PRUK.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CACX.L Lyxor CAC 40 (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist | 2.53% | 19.60% | -4.39% | 16.83% | -0.56% | 22.14% | 12.59% |
PRUK.L Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) | 2.88% | 13.57% | 5.85% | 7.37% | -22.76% | 12.69% | 22.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between CACX.L and PRUK.L is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2020 | 0.64 |
The correlation between CACX.L and PRUK.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.66 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
CACX.L vs. PRUK.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CACX.L
PRUK.L
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
Industrials
CACX.L
PRUK.L
Financial Services
CACX.L
PRUK.L
Consumer Cyclical
CACX.L
PRUK.L
Energy
CACX.L
PRUK.L
Healthcare
CACX.L
PRUK.L
Consumer Defensive
CACX.L
PRUK.L
Technology
CACX.L
PRUK.L
Communication Services
CACX.L
PRUK.L
Basic Materials
CACX.L
PRUK.L
Real Estate
CACX.L
PRUK.L
Utilities
CACX.L
PRUK.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CACX.L vs. PRUK.L — Risk / Return Rank
CACX.L
PRUK.L
CACX.L vs. PRUK.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor CAC 40 (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (CACX.L) and Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) (PRUK.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CACX.L | PRUK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.13 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.97 | 0.76 | +0.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.95 | 2.52 | +0.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CACX.L | PRUK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 | 0.70 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | 0.05 | +0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.38 | +0.14 |
Drawdowns
CACX.L vs. PRUK.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CACX.L drawdown since its inception was -32.83%, smaller than the maximum PRUK.L drawdown of -36.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CACX.L and PRUK.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CACX.L | PRUK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.83% | -36.10% | +3.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.81% | -13.05% | +1.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.77% | -18.00% | +3.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.36% | -36.10% | +16.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.83% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.61% | -3.76% | +0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.30% | -14.80% | +9.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.89% | 3.93% | -0.04% |
Volatility
CACX.L vs. PRUK.L - Volatility Comparison
Lyxor CAC 40 (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (CACX.L) and Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) (PRUK.L) have volatilities of 4.87% and 4.82%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CACX.L | PRUK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.87% | 4.82% | +0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.20% | 11.72% | -0.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.50% | 14.14% | +0.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.71% | 16.54% | +0.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.62% | 17.45% | +0.17% |
CACX.L vs. PRUK.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CACX.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than PRUK.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CACX.L vs. PRUK.L - Dividend Comparison
CACX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%, less than PRUK.L's 3.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CACX.L Lyxor CAC 40 (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist | 2.83% | 2.90% | 3.00% | 2.78% | 2.54% | 1.95% | 1.66% | 3.03% | 3.70% | 2.94% | 3.49% | 3.46% |
PRUK.L Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) | 3.60% | 3.70% | 3.63% | 3.43% | 3.50% | 1.73% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CACX.L and PRUK.L have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PRUK.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PRUK.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for CACX.L.
CACX.L tracks Euronext Paris CAC 40 NR EUR, while PRUK.L tracks FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for CACX.L and 0.05% for PRUK.L.
Find the right allocation for CACX.L and PRUK.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer