CACX.L vs. IMIB.L

Last updated Jul 1, 2026

CACX.L (Lyxor CAC 40 (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist) and IMIB.L (iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)) are both Europe Equities funds - CACX.L tracks the Euronext Paris CAC 40 NR EUR while IMIB.L tracks the FTSE Italia AllShare TR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CACX.L returned 10.96%/yr vs 15.88%/yr for IMIB.L. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CACX.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for IMIB.L.

Performance

CACX.L vs. IMIB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor CAC 40 (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (CACX.L) and iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IMIB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CACX.L achieves a 4.40% return, which is significantly lower than IMIB.L's 16.55% return. Over the past 10 years, CACX.L has underperformed IMIB.L with an annualized return of 10.96%, while IMIB.L has yielded a comparatively higher 15.88% annualized return.

CACX.L

• 1D: 0.28%
• 1M: 2.07%
• YTD: 4.40%
• 6M: 3.83%
• 1Y: 13.13%
• 3Y*: 7.43%
• 5Y*: 8.17%
• 10Y*: 10.96%

IMIB.L

• 1D: 0.66%
• 1M: 2.72%
• YTD: 16.55%
• 6M: 16.00%
• 1Y: 35.64%
• 3Y*: 27.91%
• 5Y*: 20.62%
• 10Y*: 15.88%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CACX.L vs. IMIB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CACX.L Lyxor CAC 40 (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist	4.40%	19.60%	-4.39%	16.83%	-0.56%	22.14%	0.79%	26.03%	-5.19%	19.33%
IMIB.L iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)	16.55%	43.78%	13.17%	30.55%	-3.59%	18.30%	1.46%	24.85%	-15.32%	18.99%

Correlation

The correlation between CACX.L and IMIB.L is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.77
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.81
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.83
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2008	0.73

The correlation between CACX.L and IMIB.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (all time) to 0.83 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CACX.L vs. IMIB.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CACX.L	IMIB.L
Industrials	35.3%	11.4%
Financial Services	15.4%	45.3%
Consumer Cyclical	14.8%	9.9%
Energy	9.5%	7.9%
Healthcare	9.4%	1.2%
Consumer Defensive	4.8%	0.4%
Technology	4.0%	5.5%
Communication Services	3.2%	1.7%
Basic Materials	2.4%	0.5%
Real Estate	0.8%	0.3%
Utilities	0.5%	15.9%

Return for Risk

CACX.L vs. IMIB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CACX.L

CACX.L Risk / Return Rank: 26
CACX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
CACX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
CACX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 27
CACX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
CACX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 27

IMIB.L

IMIB.L Risk / Return Rank: 81
IMIB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
IMIB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
IMIB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 82
IMIB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
IMIB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CACX.L vs. IMIB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor CAC 40 (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (CACX.L) and iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IMIB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CACX.L	IMIB.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.91	2.36	-1.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.34	3.20	-1.86
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.41	-0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.11	3.45	-2.34
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.33	12.49	-9.16

CACX.L vs. IMIB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CACX.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is lower than the IMIB.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CACX.L and IMIB.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CACX.L vs. IMIB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CACX.L drawdown since its inception was -54.68%, smaller than the maximum IMIB.L drawdown of -70.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CACX.L and IMIB.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	CACX.L	IMIB.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.68%	-70.92%	+16.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.81%	-10.28%	-1.53%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.77%	-15.58%	+0.81%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.36%	-24.06%	+4.70%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.83%	-36.68%	+3.85%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.85%	-3.06%	+1.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.41%	-34.74%	+15.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.93%	2.85%	+1.08%

Volatility

CACX.L vs. IMIB.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lyxor CAC 40 (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (CACX.L) is 2.82%, while iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IMIB.L) has a volatility of 4.01%. This indicates that CACX.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IMIB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CACX.L	IMIB.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.82%	4.01%	-1.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.24%	12.36%	-1.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.31%	15.05%	-0.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.69%	17.93%	-1.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.58%	19.31%	-1.73%

CACX.L vs. IMIB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CACX.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than IMIB.L's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

CACX.L vs. IMIB.L - Dividend Comparison

CACX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.78%, less than IMIB.L's 3.75% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CACX.L Lyxor CAC 40 (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist	2.78%	2.90%	3.00%	2.79%	2.54%	1.95%	1.66%	4.70%	6.43%	4.82%	3.49%	3.46%
IMIB.L iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)	3.75%	3.83%	4.53%	3.77%	3.90%	3.15%	1.44%	3.41%	0.00%	0.61%	2.82%	2.15%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CACX.L and IMIB.L in my portfolio?

CACX.L and IMIB.L have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CACX.L or IMIB.L?

On fees, CACX.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CACX.L or IMIB.L?

CACX.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for IMIB.L.

What is the main difference between CACX.L and IMIB.L?

CACX.L tracks Euronext Paris CAC 40 NR EUR, while IMIB.L tracks FTSE Italia AllShare TR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for CACX.L and 0.35% for IMIB.L.