CACX.L vs. FLXD.L
CACX.L (Lyxor CAC 40 (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist) and FLXD.L (Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF) are both Europe Equities funds - CACX.L tracks the Euronext Paris CAC 40 NR EUR while FLXD.L tracks the MSCI Europe High Div Yld NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CACX.L returned 8.00%/yr vs 13.18%/yr for FLXD.L. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.25% expense ratio.
Performance
CACX.L vs. FLXD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CACX.L is traded in GBp, while FLXD.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the FLXD.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CACX.L achieves a 2.53% return, which is significantly lower than FLXD.L's 9.29% return.
CACX.L
- 1D
- 0.84%
- 1M
- 3.20%
- YTD
- 2.53%
- 6M
- 2.64%
- 1Y
- 11.49%
- 3Y*
- 7.70%
- 5Y*
- 8.00%
- 10Y*
- 10.55%
FLXD.L
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- -0.03%
- YTD
- 9.29%
- 6M
- 12.43%
- 1Y
- 20.53%
- 3Y*
- 19.08%
- 5Y*
- 13.18%
- 10Y*
- —
CACX.L vs. FLXD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CACX.L Lyxor CAC 40 (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist | 2.53% | 19.60% | -4.39% | 16.83% | -0.56% | 22.14% | 0.79% | 23.85% | -7.71% | 1.53% |
FLXD.L Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF | 9.29% | 31.50% | 8.51% | 9.23% | 6.26% | 10.54% | 1.48% | 13.79% | -11.21% | -3.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between CACX.L and FLXD.L is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2017 | 0.70 |
Over the past year, the correlation between CACX.L and FLXD.L has dropped to 0.45 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
CACX.L vs. FLXD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CACX.L
FLXD.L
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
Industrials
CACX.L
FLXD.L
Financial Services
CACX.L
FLXD.L
Consumer Cyclical
CACX.L
FLXD.L
Energy
CACX.L
FLXD.L
Healthcare
CACX.L
FLXD.L
Consumer Defensive
CACX.L
FLXD.L
Technology
CACX.L
FLXD.L
Communication Services
CACX.L
FLXD.L
Basic Materials
CACX.L
FLXD.L
Real Estate
CACX.L
FLXD.L
Utilities
CACX.L
FLXD.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CACX.L vs. FLXD.L — Risk / Return Rank
CACX.L
FLXD.L
CACX.L vs. FLXD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor CAC 40 (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (CACX.L) and Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF (FLXD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CACX.L | FLXD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.43 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.97 | 5.64 | -4.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.95 | 15.75 | -12.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CACX.L | FLXD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 | 2.40 | -1.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | 1.21 | -0.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.64 | -0.12 |
Drawdowns
CACX.L vs. FLXD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CACX.L drawdown since its inception was -32.83%, which is greater than FLXD.L's maximum drawdown of -29.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CACX.L and FLXD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CACX.L | FLXD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.83% | -29.71% | -3.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.81% | -3.62% | -8.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.77% | -7.78% | -6.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.36% | -11.76% | -7.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.83% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.61% | -2.77% | -0.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.30% | -4.13% | -1.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.89% | 1.30% | +2.59% |
Volatility
CACX.L vs. FLXD.L - Volatility Comparison
Lyxor CAC 40 (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (CACX.L) has a higher volatility of 4.87% compared to Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF (FLXD.L) at 2.67%. This indicates that CACX.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLXD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CACX.L | FLXD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.87% | 2.67% | +2.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.20% | 6.95% | +4.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.50% | 8.52% | +5.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.71% | 10.85% | +5.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.62% | 12.91% | +4.71% |
CACX.L vs. FLXD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both CACX.L and FLXD.L have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CACX.L vs. FLXD.L - Dividend Comparison
CACX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%, less than FLXD.L's 4.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CACX.L Lyxor CAC 40 (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist | 2.83% | 2.90% | 3.00% | 2.78% | 2.54% | 1.95% | 1.66% | 3.03% | 3.70% | 2.94% | 3.49% | 3.46% |
FLXD.L Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF | 4.37% | 4.90% | 5.18% | 5.75% | 5.87% | 5.51% | 3.90% | 1.53% | 1.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CACX.L and FLXD.L have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CACX.L and FLXD.L have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.
CACX.L tracks Euronext Paris CAC 40 NR EUR, while FLXD.L tracks MSCI Europe High Div Yld NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Franklin Templeton.
Find the right allocation for CACX.L and FLXD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer