CACX.L vs. DAX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CACX.L (Lyxor CAC 40 (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist) and DAX (Global X DAX Germany ETF) are both Europe Equities funds - CACX.L tracks the Euronext Paris CAC 40 NR EUR while DAX tracks the DAX Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CACX.L returned 10.55%/yr vs 9.53%/yr for DAX. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CACX.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for DAX.

Performance

CACX.L vs. DAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor CAC 40 (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (CACX.L) and Global X DAX Germany ETF (DAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

CACX.L is traded in GBp, while DAX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the DAX values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CACX.L achieves a 2.53% return, which is significantly higher than DAX's -0.97% return. Over the past 10 years, CACX.L has outperformed DAX with an annualized return of 10.55%, while DAX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.53% annualized return.

CACX.L

• 1D: 0.84%
• 1M: -0.12%
• YTD: 2.53%
• 6M: 2.75%
• 1Y: 11.60%
• 3Y*: 7.70%
• 5Y*: 8.00%
• 10Y*: 10.55%

DAX

• 1D: -1.77%
• 1M: -1.90%
• YTD: -0.97%
• 6M: 0.66%
• 1Y: 3.22%
• 3Y*: 14.75%
• 5Y*: 8.72%
• 10Y*: 9.53%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CACX.L vs. DAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CACX.L Lyxor CAC 40 (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist	2.53%	19.60%	-4.39%	16.83%	-0.56%	22.14%	0.79%	23.85%	-7.71%	17.11%
DAX Global X DAX Germany ETF	-0.97%	29.09%	12.48%	17.44%	-8.78%	8.75%	8.98%	17.46%	-18.35%	17.14%

Correlation

The correlation between CACX.L and DAX is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.58
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.62
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.66
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.67
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2014	0.69

The correlation between CACX.L and DAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.69 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CACX.L vs. DAX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CACX.L	DAX
Industrials	34.9%	34.8%
Financial Services	15.4%	21.0%
Consumer Cyclical	14.9%	7.0%
Energy	9.6%	-
Healthcare	9.5%	5.7%
Consumer Defensive	5.0%	0.9%
Technology	4.0%	13.2%
Communication Services	3.2%	6.1%
Basic Materials	2.4%	5.3%
Real Estate	0.7%	1.0%
Utilities	0.5%	5.0%

Return for Risk

CACX.L vs. DAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CACX.L

CACX.L Risk / Return Rank: 23
CACX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
CACX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
CACX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 24
CACX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
CACX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 23

DAX

DAX Risk / Return Rank: 10
DAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
DAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
DAX Omega Ratio Rank: 10
DAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
DAX Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CACX.L vs. DAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor CAC 40 (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (CACX.L) and Global X DAX Germany ETF (DAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CACX.L	DAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.79	0.21	+0.58
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.18	0.40	+0.78
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.05	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.97	0.24	+0.73
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.95	0.78	+2.17
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CACX.L vs. DAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CACX.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is higher than the DAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CACX.L and DAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CACX.L	DAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79	0.21	+0.58
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.48	0.51	-0.03
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.60	0.50	+0.10
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.52	0.47	+0.05

Drawdowns

CACX.L vs. DAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CACX.L drawdown since its inception was -32.83%, smaller than the maximum DAX drawdown of -35.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CACX.L and DAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CACX.L	DAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.83%	-35.49%	+2.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.81%	-13.43%	+1.62%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.77%	-14.52%	-0.25%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.36%	-24.14%	+4.78%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.83%	-35.49%	+2.66%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.61%	-4.75%	+1.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.30%	-6.96%	+1.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.89%	4.13%	-0.24%

Volatility

CACX.L vs. DAX - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor CAC 40 (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (CACX.L) and Global X DAX Germany ETF (DAX) have volatilities of 4.87% and 4.71%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CACX.L	DAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.87%	4.71%	+0.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.20%	12.53%	-1.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.50%	15.47%	-0.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.71%	17.10%	-0.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.62%	19.09%	-1.47%

CACX.L vs. DAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CACX.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than DAX's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

CACX.L vs. DAX - Dividend Comparison

CACX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%, more than DAX's 1.50% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CACX.L Lyxor CAC 40 (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist	2.83%	2.90%	3.00%	2.78%	2.54%	1.95%	1.66%	3.03%	3.70%	2.94%	3.49%	3.46%
DAX Global X DAX Germany ETF	1.50%	1.47%	2.24%	2.48%	2.80%	2.65%	2.25%	2.47%	3.33%	1.73%	1.78%	1.41%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CACX.L and DAX in my portfolio?

CACX.L and DAX have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CACX.L or DAX?

On fees, DAX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CACX.L or DAX?

DAX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for CACX.L.

What is the main difference between CACX.L and DAX?

CACX.L tracks Euronext Paris CAC 40 NR EUR, while DAX tracks DAX Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for CACX.L and 0.20% for DAX.