CACI vs. BIL
CACI (CACI International Inc) is a stock, while BIL (SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF) is Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg 1-3 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index. Over the past 10 years, CACI returned 17.49%/yr vs 2.23%/yr for BIL. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
CACI vs. BIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CACI achieves a -13.13% return, which is significantly lower than BIL's 1.92% return. Over the past 10 years, CACI has outperformed BIL with an annualized return of 17.49%, while BIL has yielded a comparatively lower 2.23% annualized return.
CACI
- 1D
- -1.90%
- 1M
- -8.24%
- 6M
- -26.24%
- YTD
- -13.13%
- 1Y
- -2.28%
- 3Y*
- 10.10%
- 5Y*
- 11.87%
- 10Y*
- 17.49%
BIL
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- 6M
- 1.78%
- YTD
- 1.92%
- 1Y
- 3.81%
- 3Y*
- 4.58%
- 5Y*
- 3.50%
- 10Y*
- 2.23%
CACI vs. BIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CACI CACI International Inc | -13.13% | 31.86% | 24.76% | 7.74% | 11.66% | 7.97% | -0.26% | 73.57% | 8.83% | 6.48% |
BIL SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF | 1.92% | 4.15% | 5.19% | 4.94% | 1.40% | -0.10% | 0.40% | 2.03% | 1.74% | 0.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between CACI and BIL is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 2007 | -0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CACI vs. BIL — Risk / Return Rank
CACI
BIL
CACI vs. BIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CACI International Inc (CACI) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CACI | BIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -19.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -152.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 69.35 | -68.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.07 | 349.26 | -349.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.16 | 2,476.82 | -2,476.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CACI vs. BIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CACI drawdown since its inception was -62.89%, which is greater than BIL's maximum drawdown of -0.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CACI and BIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CACI | BIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.89% | -0.78% | -62.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.06% | -0.01% | -33.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.88% | -0.01% | -42.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.88% | -0.08% | -42.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.88% | -0.21% | -42.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.10% | 0.00% | -30.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.10% | -0.26% | -18.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.99% | 0.00% | +13.99% |
Volatility
CACI vs. BIL - Volatility Comparison
CACI International Inc (CACI) has a higher volatility of 13.18% compared to SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) at 0.07%. This indicates that CACI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CACI | BIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.18% | 0.07% | +13.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.63% | 0.14% | +25.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.80% | 0.20% | +33.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.56% | 0.26% | +27.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.17% | 0.26% | +27.91% |
Dividends
CACI vs. BIL - Dividend Comparison
CACI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.81%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIL SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF | 3.81% | 4.13% | 5.03% | 4.92% | 1.35% | 0.00% | 0.30% | 2.05% | 1.66% | 0.68% | 0.07% |
CACI CACI International Inc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CACI and BIL have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CACI has higher volatility (13.18%) compared to BIL (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CACI dropped -62.89% vs BIL's -0.78%.
BIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (19.02 vs -0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CACI and BIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer