CACE.TO vs. CAUS.TO
CACE.TO (Avantis CIBC Canadian Equity ETF) and CAUS.TO (Avantis CIBC U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CACE.TO is a Canada Equities fund actively managed by Avantis, while CAUS.TO is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Avantis. Both are actively managed. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.19% expense ratio.
Performance
CACE.TO vs. CAUS.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CACE.TO
- 1D
- 1.02%
- 1M
- 5.11%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CAUS.TO
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- 6.07%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CACE.TO vs. CAUS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CACE.TO Avantis CIBC Canadian Equity ETF | 5.77% |
CAUS.TO Avantis CIBC U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF | 10.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between CACE.TO and CAUS.TO is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2026 | 0.65 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CACE.TO vs. CAUS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis CIBC Canadian Equity ETF (CACE.TO) and Avantis CIBC U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF (CAUS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CACE.TO | CAUS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.33 | 2.79 | -1.46 |
Drawdowns
CACE.TO vs. CAUS.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CACE.TO drawdown since its inception was -10.51%, which is greater than CAUS.TO's maximum drawdown of -6.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CACE.TO and CAUS.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CACE.TO | CAUS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.51% | -6.25% | -4.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.82% | -1.66% | -1.16% |
Volatility
CACE.TO vs. CAUS.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CACE.TO | CAUS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.37% | 15.47% | +0.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.37% | 15.47% | +0.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.37% | 15.47% | +0.90% |
CACE.TO vs. CAUS.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both CACE.TO and CAUS.TO have an expense ratio of 0.19%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CACE.TO vs. CAUS.TO - Dividend Comparison
Neither CACE.TO nor CAUS.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CACE.TO and CAUS.TO have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.19% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CACE.TO and CAUS.TO have the same expense ratio: 0.19% per year.
CACE.TO is categorized as Canada Equities, while CAUS.TO is Large Cap Blend Equities.
Find the right allocation for CACE.TO and CAUS.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer