PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CACE.TO vs. CAUS.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CACE.TO vs. CAUS.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Avantis CIBC Canadian Equity ETF (CACE.TO) and Avantis CIBC U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF (CAUS.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


CACE.TO

1D
1.02%
1M
5.11%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CAUS.TO

1D
0.67%
1M
6.07%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CACE.TO vs. CAUS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CACE.TO and CAUS.TO is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2026

0.65

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CACE.TO vs. CAUS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis CIBC Canadian Equity ETF (CACE.TO) and Avantis CIBC U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF (CAUS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CACE.TO vs. CAUS.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CACE.TOCAUS.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.33

2.79

-1.46

Drawdowns

CACE.TO vs. CAUS.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CACE.TO drawdown since its inception was -10.51%, which is greater than CAUS.TO's maximum drawdown of -6.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CACE.TO and CAUS.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CACE.TOCAUS.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.51%

-6.25%

-4.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.82%

-1.66%

-1.16%

Volatility

CACE.TO vs. CAUS.TO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CACE.TOCAUS.TODifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.37%

15.47%

+0.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.37%

15.47%

+0.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.37%

15.47%

+0.90%

CACE.TO vs. CAUS.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CACE.TO and CAUS.TO have an expense ratio of 0.19%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CACE.TO vs. CAUS.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither CACE.TO nor CAUS.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CACE.TO and CAUS.TO have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.19% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CACE.TO and CAUS.TO have the same expense ratio: 0.19% per year.

CACE.TO is categorized as Canada Equities, while CAUS.TO is Large Cap Blend Equities.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CACE.TO and CAUS.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer