CABDX vs. APGZX
Compare and contrast key facts about AB Relative Value Fund (CABDX) and AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class Z (APGZX).
CABDX is managed by AllianceBernstein. It was launched on Jul 1, 1932. APGZX is managed by AllianceBernstein. It was launched on Jul 1, 2015.
Performance
CABDX vs. APGZX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CABDX vs. APGZX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CABDX AB Relative Value Fund | 0.62% | 10.26% | 12.63% | 11.24% | -4.23% | 27.48% | 2.81% | 23.06% | -6.00% | 18.84% |
APGZX AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class Z | -12.76% | 13.26% | 25.47% | 35.12% | -28.74% | 29.00% | 34.47% | 34.24% | 2.30% | 31.81% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CABDX achieves a 0.62% return, which is significantly higher than APGZX's -12.76% return. Over the past 10 years, CABDX has underperformed APGZX with an annualized return of 10.24%, while APGZX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.52% annualized return.
CABDX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -5.67%
- YTD
- 0.62%
- 6M
- 3.12%
- 1Y
- 9.01%
- 3Y*
- 11.54%
- 5Y*
- 8.62%
- 10Y*
- 10.24%
APGZX
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -10.09%
- YTD
- -12.76%
- 6M
- -12.55%
- 1Y
- 7.79%
- 3Y*
- 14.45%
- 5Y*
- 8.77%
- 10Y*
- 14.52%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CABDX vs. APGZX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CABDX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than APGZX's 0.52% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CABDX vs. APGZX — Risk / Return Rank
CABDX
APGZX
CABDX vs. APGZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Relative Value Fund (CABDX) and AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class Z (APGZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CABDX | APGZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.67 | 0.40 | +0.27 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.02 | 0.73 | +0.28 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.10 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.73 | 0.34 | +0.38 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.25 | 1.34 | +1.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CABDX | APGZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 | 0.40 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 | 0.44 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 | 0.74 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.73 | -0.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between CABDX and APGZX is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
CABDX vs. APGZX - Dividend Comparison
CABDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.01%, less than APGZX's 11.19% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CABDX AB Relative Value Fund | 6.01% | 6.05% | 11.24% | 6.55% | 8.00% | 10.15% | 1.18% | 4.45% | 15.34% | 12.71% | 6.97% | 4.34% |
APGZX AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class Z | 11.19% | 9.77% | 6.62% | 1.69% | 0.87% | 7.19% | 2.60% | 3.49% | 9.11% | 3.78% | 2.72% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CABDX vs. APGZX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CABDX drawdown since its inception was -57.40%, which is greater than APGZX's maximum drawdown of -33.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CABDX and APGZX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CABDX | APGZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.40% | -33.87% | -23.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.67% | -15.21% | +3.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.53% | -33.87% | +16.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.33% | -33.87% | -2.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.21% | -15.21% | +9.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.47% | -6.08% | -2.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.61% | 3.90% | -1.29% |
Volatility
CABDX vs. APGZX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AB Relative Value Fund (CABDX) is 3.28%, while AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class Z (APGZX) has a volatility of 5.13%. This indicates that CABDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than APGZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CABDX | APGZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.28% | 5.13% | -1.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.79% | 10.81% | -3.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.06% | 19.91% | -4.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.46% | 20.12% | -5.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.51% | 19.60% | -3.09% |