PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CAAAX vs. CSIEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CAAAX vs. CSIEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calvert Growth Allocation Fund (CAAAX) and Calvert Equity Fund (CSIEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CAAAX achieves a 11.34% return, which is significantly higher than CSIEX's -12.17% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CAAAX having a 11.27% annualized return and CSIEX not far ahead at 11.61%.


CAAAX

1D
-0.18%
1M
2.73%
YTD
11.34%
6M
10.75%
1Y
22.98%
3Y*
15.61%
5Y*
7.56%
10Y*
11.27%

CSIEX

1D
-1.28%
1M
-3.26%
YTD
-12.17%
6M
-12.57%
1Y
-8.64%
3Y*
4.09%
5Y*
2.90%
10Y*
11.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CAAAX vs. CSIEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CAAAX
Calvert Growth Allocation Fund
11.34%14.93%12.56%15.14%-18.26%16.67%18.55%27.33%-7.73%20.27%
CSIEX
Calvert Equity Fund
-12.17%7.27%8.35%17.93%-17.61%28.90%24.26%36.46%5.03%25.78%

Correlation

The correlation between CAAAX and CSIEX is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2005

0.91

Over the past year, the correlation between CAAAX and CSIEX has dropped to 0.68 - well below their long-term average of 0.91, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CAAAX vs. CSIEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CAAAX
CAAAX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
CAAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
CAAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

CSIEX
CSIEX Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
CSIEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSIEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSIEX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
CSIEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSIEX Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CAAAX vs. CSIEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert Growth Allocation Fund (CAAAX) and Calvert Equity Fund (CSIEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CAAAXCSIEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

0.91

+0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.57

-0.54

+3.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.13

-1.18

+12.31

CAAAX vs. CSIEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CAAAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is higher than the CSIEX Sharpe Ratio of -0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CAAAX and CSIEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CAAAX vs. CSIEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAAAX drawdown since its inception was -53.45%, which is greater than CSIEX's maximum drawdown of -50.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAAAX and CSIEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CAAAXCSIEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.45%

-50.81%

-2.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.39%

-14.28%

+4.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.37%

-14.87%

-0.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.90%

-25.71%

-0.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.59%

-30.50%

-2.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.21%

-14.28%

+14.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.24%

-6.24%

-2.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.16%

6.50%

-4.34%

Volatility

CAAAX vs. CSIEX - Volatility Comparison

Calvert Growth Allocation Fund (CAAAX) has a higher volatility of 4.88% compared to Calvert Equity Fund (CSIEX) at 4.54%. This indicates that CAAAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSIEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CAAAXCSIEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.88%

4.54%

+0.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.23%

10.03%

+0.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.28%

12.69%

-0.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.26%

16.30%

-2.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.55%

17.19%

-1.64%

CAAAX vs. CSIEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CAAAX has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is lower than CSIEX's 0.91% expense ratio.


Dividends

CAAAX vs. CSIEX - Dividend Comparison

CAAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.59%, less than CSIEX's 26.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CAAAX
Calvert Growth Allocation Fund
3.59%4.00%2.50%4.47%2.81%3.68%3.34%3.53%6.44%5.57%5.13%15.27%
CSIEX
Calvert Equity Fund
26.15%22.97%8.74%1.79%3.40%3.56%2.70%2.87%8.78%8.10%11.30%25.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


CAAAX and CSIEX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CAAAX has higher volatility (4.88%) compared to CSIEX (4.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CAAAX dropped -53.45% vs CSIEX's -50.81%.

CAAAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs -0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CAAAX and CSIEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer