PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CAAA vs. GRID
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CAAA vs. GRID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Commercial Mortgage Opportunities ETF (CAAA) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CAAA achieves a 0.74% return, which is significantly lower than GRID's 23.40% return.


CAAA

1D
-0.22%
1M
0.55%
YTD
0.74%
6M
0.86%
1Y
4.50%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GRID

1D
-4.46%
1M
-1.96%
YTD
23.40%
6M
22.11%
1Y
42.41%
3Y*
24.21%
5Y*
16.63%
10Y*
19.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CAAA vs. GRID - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CAAA and GRID is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2024

0.15

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CAAA vs. GRID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CAAA
CAAA Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
CAAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAAA Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
CAAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAAA Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

GRID
GRID Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
GRID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRID Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRID Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
GRID Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRID Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CAAA vs. GRID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Commercial Mortgage Opportunities ETF (CAAA) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CAAAGRIDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.35

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.17

3.63

-1.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.45

12.92

-6.47

CAAA vs. GRID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CAAA Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is comparable to the GRID Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CAAA and GRID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CAAA vs. GRID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAAA drawdown since its inception was -2.24%, smaller than the maximum GRID drawdown of -40.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAAA and GRID.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CAAAGRIDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.24%

-40.56%

+38.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.08%

-11.73%

+9.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.87%

-5.55%

+4.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.56%

-8.42%

+7.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.70%

3.29%

-2.59%

Volatility

CAAA vs. GRID - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Commercial Mortgage Opportunities ETF (CAAA) is 1.01%, while First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID) has a volatility of 10.12%. This indicates that CAAA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GRID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CAAAGRIDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.01%

10.12%

-9.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.25%

18.23%

-15.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.10%

21.26%

-18.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.21%

21.37%

-18.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.21%

22.80%

-19.59%

CAAA vs. GRID - Expense Ratio Comparison

CAAA has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than GRID's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

CAAA vs. GRID - Dividend Comparison

CAAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.29%, more than GRID's 0.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CAAA
First Trust Commercial Mortgage Opportunities ETF
5.29%6.09%4.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GRID
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund
0.80%1.01%1.06%1.23%1.26%0.63%0.68%1.26%1.28%1.07%1.07%1.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


CAAA and GRID have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GRID has higher volatility (10.12%) compared to CAAA (1.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CAAA dropped -2.24% vs GRID's -40.56%.

On 1-year performance, GRID leads with 42.41% vs 4.50% for CAAA. On fees, CAAA is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, CAAA has been the lower-risk option at 1.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GRID has performed better with a 42.41% return vs 4.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CAAA is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for GRID.

CAAA has the higher dividend yield at 5.29%, compared with 0.80% for GRID.

CAAA is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while GRID is Alternative Energy Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for CAAA and 0.70% for GRID.

GRID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CAAA and GRID

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer