PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CA vs. TAXI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CA vs. TAXI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF (CA) and Northern Trust Intermediate Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (TAXI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CA achieves a 1.20% return, which is significantly higher than TAXI's 0.15% return.


CA

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
6M
0.89%
YTD
1.20%
1Y
6.72%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.51%

TAXI

1D
0.24%
1M
-1.01%
6M
-0.43%
YTD
0.15%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$4.72K
$663.32K$991.27K$963.47K

CA vs. TAXI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CA and TAXI is 0.50, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2025

0.50

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CA vs. TAXI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CA
CA Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
CA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
CA Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
CA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
CA Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

TAXI

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CA vs. TAXI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF (CA) and Northern Trust Intermediate Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (TAXI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CATAXIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.75

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.55

CA vs. TAXI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CA vs. TAXI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CA drawdown since its inception was -5.24%, which is greater than TAXI's maximum drawdown of -2.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CA and TAXI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CATAXIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.24%

-2.23%

-3.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.75%

-1.57%

+0.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.24%

-0.52%

-0.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.70%

Volatility

CA vs. TAXI - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CATAXIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.38%

1.96%

+0.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.87%

1.96%

+1.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.87%

1.96%

+1.91%

CA vs. TAXI - Expense Ratio Comparison

CA has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than TAXI's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CA vs. TAXI - Dividend Comparison

CA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, more than TAXI's 2.25% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


CA and TAXI have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TAXI is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TAXI is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for CA.

CA has the higher dividend yield at 2.69%, compared with 2.25% for TAXI.

CA tracks ICE AMT-Free Broad Liquid California Municipal Index, while TAXI tracks ICE Intermediate Term Focused Municipal Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for CA and 0.05% for TAXI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CA and TAXI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer