PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
C50U.L vs. LCUK.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

C50U.L vs. LCUK.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

C50U.L (Amundi EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF DR USD (C)) and LCUK.L (Lyxor Core UK Equity All Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist) are both Europe Equities funds from Amundi - C50U.L tracks the MSCI EMU NR EUR while LCUK.L tracks the FTSE AllSh TR GBP. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, C50U.L returned 10.48%/yr vs 8.86%/yr for LCUK.L. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. C50U.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for LCUK.L.

Performance

C50U.L vs. LCUK.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amundi EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF DR USD (C) (C50U.L) and Lyxor Core UK Equity All Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (LCUK.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

C50U.L is traded in USD, while LCUK.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the LCUK.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, C50U.L achieves a 6.12% return, which is significantly higher than LCUK.L's 5.67% return.

C50U.L

1D
0.62%
1M
3.85%
YTD
6.12%
6M
8.26%
1Y
17.64%
3Y*
18.70%
5Y*
10.48%
10Y*
—

LCUK.L

1D
0.59%
1M
1.02%
YTD
5.67%
6M
5.82%
1Y
15.42%
3Y*
16.32%
5Y*
8.86%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

C50U.L vs. LCUK.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
C50U.L
Amundi EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF DR USD (C)		6.12%37.30%4.69%26.93%-13.63%15.13%
LCUK.L
Lyxor Core UK Equity All Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist		5.67%30.14%7.23%12.91%-8.77%15.53%

Correlation

The correlation between C50U.L and LCUK.L is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2021

0.78

The correlation between C50U.L and LCUK.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.78 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

C50U.L vs. LCUK.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
C50U.L
LCUK.L

Financial Services

25.6%
24.2%

Industrials

22.2%
13.9%

Technology

18.6%
0.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
5.2%

Healthcare

5.4%
13.2%

Energy

5.2%
11.1%

Utilities

4.7%
5.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.0%
13.7%

Communication Services

2.5%
3.0%

Basic Materials

1.7%
8.3%

Real Estate

-

1.4%

Financial Services

C50U.L
25.6%
LCUK.L
24.2%

Industrials

C50U.L
22.2%
LCUK.L
13.9%

Technology

C50U.L
18.6%
LCUK.L
0.9%

Consumer Cyclical

C50U.L
10.1%
LCUK.L
5.2%

Healthcare

C50U.L
5.4%
LCUK.L
13.2%

Energy

C50U.L
5.2%
LCUK.L
11.1%

Utilities

C50U.L
4.7%
LCUK.L
5.1%

Consumer Defensive

C50U.L
4.0%
LCUK.L
13.7%

Communication Services

C50U.L
2.5%
LCUK.L
3.0%

Basic Materials

C50U.L
1.7%
LCUK.L
8.3%

Real Estate

C50U.L

-

LCUK.L
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Amundi EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF DR USD (C)

Lyxor Core UK Equity All Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist

Often compared with C50U.L:
C50U.L vs. AE50.DEC50U.L vs. MSED.LC50U.L vs. SXRW.DEC50U.L vs. SXRT.DEC50U.L vs. IMAE.ASC50U.L vs. ETDD.DEC50U.L vs. SPYL.DE
Often compared with LCUK.L:
LCUK.L vs. LGUK.LLCUK.L vs. JURE.LLCUK.L vs. XASX.LLCUK.L vs. VUKG.LLCUK.L vs. SMGB.LLCUK.L vs. IITU.LLCUK.L vs. VUKE.L

Return for Risk

C50U.L vs. LCUK.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
C50U.L
C50U.L Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
C50U.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
C50U.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
C50U.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
C50U.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
C50U.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
LCUK.L
LCUK.L Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
LCUK.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCUK.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCUK.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
LCUK.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCUK.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

C50U.L vs. LCUK.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF DR USD (C) (C50U.L) and Lyxor Core UK Equity All Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (LCUK.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

C50U.LLCUK.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.99
1.06

-0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.53
1.52

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.19

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.34

1.53

-0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.57

5.09

-0.52

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

C50U.L vs. LCUK.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current C50U.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is comparable to the LCUK.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of C50U.L and LCUK.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

C50U.LLCUK.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

1.06

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.53

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.39

+0.25

Drawdowns

C50U.L vs. LCUK.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum C50U.L drawdown since its inception was -34.81%, smaller than the maximum LCUK.L drawdown of -43.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for C50U.L and LCUK.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

C50U.LLCUK.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.81%

-43.14%

+8.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.07%

-10.06%

-3.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.61%

-13.41%

-2.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.81%

-27.39%

-7.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.18%

-4.39%

+3.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.56%

-7.24%

+0.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.85%

3.02%

+0.83%

Volatility

C50U.L vs. LCUK.L - Volatility Comparison

Amundi EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF DR USD (C) (C50U.L) has a higher volatility of 5.92% compared to Lyxor Core UK Equity All Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (LCUK.L) at 4.81%. This indicates that C50U.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LCUK.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

C50U.LLCUK.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.92%

4.81%

+1.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.69%

12.05%

+2.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.86%

14.44%

+3.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.94%

16.81%

+4.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.62%

18.93%

+1.69%

C50U.L vs. LCUK.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

C50U.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than LCUK.L's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

C50U.L vs. LCUK.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither C50U.L nor LCUK.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
C50U.L
Amundi EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF DR USD (C)		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LCUK.L
Lyxor Core UK Equity All Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist		0.00%0.00%3.68%3.05%3.94%3.86%3.00%3.48%

Frequently Asked Questions

C50U.L and LCUK.L have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LCUK.L is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LCUK.L is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for C50U.L.

C50U.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR, while LCUK.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for C50U.L and 0.04% for LCUK.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for C50U.L and LCUK.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer