C024.DE vs. CC1U.L
C024.DE (Amundi MSCI China A II UCITS ETF Dist) and CC1U.L (Amundi MSCI China UCITS ETF-C USD) are both China Equities funds from Amundi - C024.DE tracks the MSCI China A while CC1U.L tracks the MSCI China NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, C024.DE returned 0.96%/yr vs -0.05%/yr for CC1U.L. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. C024.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for CC1U.L.
Performance
C024.DE vs. CC1U.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
C024.DE is traded in EUR, while CC1U.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CC1U.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, C024.DE achieves a 6.31% return, which is significantly higher than CC1U.L's -8.64% return.
C024.DE
- 1D
- -3.37%
- 1M
- -8.00%
- 6M
- 2.17%
- YTD
- 6.31%
- 1Y
- 27.95%
- 3Y*
- 11.58%
- 5Y*
- 0.96%
- 10Y*
- 6.36%
CC1U.L
- 1D
- -3.41%
- 1M
- -9.45%
- 6M
- -14.77%
- YTD
- -8.64%
- 1Y
- 6.65%
- 3Y*
- 0.83%
- 5Y*
- -0.05%
- 10Y*
- —
C024.DE vs. CC1U.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C024.DE Amundi MSCI China A II UCITS ETF Dist | 6.31% | 14.97% | 22.87% | -17.78% | -16.16% | 3.42% | 21.54% | 40.72% | -20.80% |
CC1U.L Amundi MSCI China UCITS ETF-C USD | -8.64% | 22.93% | 8.24% | -13.99% | -3.70% | 4.15% | -9.94% | 15.45% | -12.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between C024.DE and CC1U.L is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2018 | 0.69 |
The correlation between C024.DE and CC1U.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (all time) to 0.81 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
C024.DE vs. CC1U.L — Risk / Return Rank
C024.DE
CC1U.L
C024.DE vs. CC1U.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI China A II UCITS ETF Dist (C024.DE) and Amundi MSCI China UCITS ETF-C USD (CC1U.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| C024.DE | CC1U.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.07 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.66 | 0.36 | +2.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.41 | 0.77 | +9.64 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
C024.DE vs. CC1U.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum C024.DE drawdown since its inception was -49.68%, which is greater than CC1U.L's maximum drawdown of -40.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for C024.DE and CC1U.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| C024.DE | CC1U.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.68% | -40.70% | -8.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.60% | -18.43% | +7.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.82% | -38.24% | +12.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.34% | -40.50% | +1.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.10% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.23% | -18.43% | +5.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.23% | -13.42% | -12.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.72% | 8.61% | -5.89% |
Volatility
C024.DE vs. CC1U.L - Volatility Comparison
Amundi MSCI China A II UCITS ETF Dist (C024.DE) has a higher volatility of 9.58% compared to Amundi MSCI China UCITS ETF-C USD (CC1U.L) at 7.90%. This indicates that C024.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CC1U.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| C024.DE | CC1U.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.58% | 7.90% | +1.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.53% | 16.37% | -1.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.31% | 23.90% | -5.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.98% | 26.44% | -3.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.16% | 24.94% | -0.78% |
C024.DE vs. CC1U.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
C024.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than CC1U.L's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
C024.DE vs. CC1U.L - Dividend Comparison
C024.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.78%, while CC1U.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C024.DE Amundi MSCI China A II UCITS ETF Dist | 1.78% | 1.89% | 2.19% | 1.98% | 1.34% | 1.22% | 1.42% | 1.88% | 2.49% |
CC1U.L Amundi MSCI China UCITS ETF-C USD | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
C024.DE and CC1U.L have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, C024.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
C024.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for CC1U.L.
C024.DE tracks MSCI China A, while CC1U.L tracks MSCI China NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for C024.DE and 0.45% for CC1U.L.
Find the right allocation for C024.DE and CC1U.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer