C024.DE vs. 36BZ.DE
C024.DE (Amundi MSCI China A II UCITS ETF Dist) and 36BZ.DE (iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF) are both China Equities funds - C024.DE tracks the MSCI China A while 36BZ.DE tracks the MSCI China A Inclusion. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, C024.DE returned 7.12%/yr vs 5.98%/yr for 36BZ.DE. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. C024.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for 36BZ.DE.
Performance
C024.DE vs. 36BZ.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, C024.DE achieves a 12.05% return, which is significantly higher than 36BZ.DE's 9.71% return. Over the past 10 years, C024.DE has outperformed 36BZ.DE with an annualized return of 7.12%, while 36BZ.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 5.98% annualized return.
C024.DE
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- 0.73%
- YTD
- 12.05%
- 6M
- 14.60%
- 1Y
- 39.67%
- 3Y*
- 12.08%
- 5Y*
- 0.57%
- 10Y*
- 7.12%
36BZ.DE
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- YTD
- 9.71%
- 6M
- 11.84%
- 1Y
- 33.04%
- 3Y*
- 8.44%
- 5Y*
- -0.23%
- 10Y*
- 5.98%
C024.DE vs. 36BZ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C024.DE Amundi MSCI China A II UCITS ETF Dist | 12.05% | 14.97% | 22.87% | -17.78% | -16.12% | 3.37% | 21.54% | 40.72% | -22.27% | 23.87% |
36BZ.DE iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF | 9.71% | 10.25% | 19.91% | -17.13% | -21.26% | 13.41% | 28.50% | 37.21% | -23.49% | 14.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between C024.DE and 36BZ.DE is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2015 | 0.87 |
The correlation between C024.DE and 36BZ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
C024.DE vs. 36BZ.DE — Risk / Return Rank
C024.DE
36BZ.DE
C024.DE vs. 36BZ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI China A II UCITS ETF Dist (C024.DE) and iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF (36BZ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| C024.DE | 36BZ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.38 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.94 | 5.10 | +0.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.19 | 13.77 | +4.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| C024.DE | 36BZ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.60 | 2.11 | +0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 | -0.01 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 | 0.27 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.03 | +0.27 |
Drawdowns
C024.DE vs. 36BZ.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum C024.DE drawdown since its inception was -49.68%, smaller than the maximum 36BZ.DE drawdown of -53.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for C024.DE and 36BZ.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| C024.DE | 36BZ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.68% | -53.30% | +3.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.78% | -6.57% | -0.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.82% | -28.01% | +2.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.46% | -41.94% | +1.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.10% | -43.38% | -3.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.55% | -10.22% | +1.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.80% | -30.19% | +5.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.22% | 2.44% | -0.22% |
Volatility
C024.DE vs. 36BZ.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi MSCI China A II UCITS ETF Dist (C024.DE) and iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF (36BZ.DE) have volatilities of 5.71% and 5.55%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| C024.DE | 36BZ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.71% | 5.55% | +0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.25% | 10.96% | +0.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.47% | 15.83% | -0.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.92% | 21.44% | +1.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.34% | 22.10% | +2.24% |
C024.DE vs. 36BZ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
C024.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than 36BZ.DE's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
C024.DE vs. 36BZ.DE - Dividend Comparison
C024.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%, while 36BZ.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
36BZ.DE iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
C024.DE Amundi MSCI China A II UCITS ETF Dist | 1.69% | 1.89% | 2.19% | 1.98% | 1.34% | 1.23% | 1.42% | 1.88% | 2.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, C024.DE and 36BZ.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, C024.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
C024.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for 36BZ.DE.
C024.DE tracks MSCI China A, while 36BZ.DE tracks MSCI China A Inclusion. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for C024.DE and 0.40% for 36BZ.DE.
Find the right allocation for C024.DE and 36BZ.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer