PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
C vs. META
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

C vs. META - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Citigroup Inc. (C) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, C achieves a 15.36% return, which is significantly higher than META's -11.24% return. Over the past 10 years, C has underperformed META with an annualized return of 15.14%, while META has yielded a comparatively higher 17.60% annualized return.


C

1D
0.61%
1M
6.16%
YTD
15.36%
6M
23.58%
1Y
74.17%
3Y*
44.93%
5Y*
15.19%
10Y*
15.14%

META

1D
-1.28%
1M
-3.98%
YTD
-11.24%
6M
-12.06%
1Y
-15.84%
3Y*
30.58%
5Y*
12.31%
10Y*
17.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

C vs. META - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
C
Citigroup Inc.
15.36%70.38%41.93%18.98%-22.09%0.93%-19.70%57.82%-28.49%27.03%
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
-11.24%13.09%66.05%194.13%-64.22%23.13%33.09%56.57%-25.71%53.38%

Correlation

The correlation between C and META is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2012

0.30

Fundamentals

Market Cap

C:

$236.71B

META:

$1.50T

EPS

C:

$8.65

META:

$27.47

PE Ratio

C:

15.41

META:

21.31

PS Ratio

C:

1.44

META:

7.00

PB Ratio

C:

1.24

META:

6.16

Total Revenue (TTM)

C:

$171.19B

META:

$214.96B

Gross Profit (TTM)

C:

$77.85B

META:

$176.14B

EBITDA (TTM)

C:

$24.12B

META:

$106.31B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

C vs. META — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

C
C Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
C Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
C Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
C Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
C Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
C Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

META
META Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
META Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
META Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
META Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
META Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
META Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

C vs. META - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Citigroup Inc. (C) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CMETADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

0.94

+0.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.05

-0.48

+5.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.54

-1.01

+15.56

C vs. META - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current C Sharpe Ratio is 2.65, which is higher than the META Sharpe Ratio of -0.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of C and META, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CMETADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.65

-0.45

+3.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.28

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

0.46

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

0.54

-0.39

Drawdowns

C vs. META - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum C drawdown since its inception was -98.00%, which is greater than META's maximum drawdown of -76.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for C and META.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CMETADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.00%

-76.74%

-21.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.76%

-33.30%

+18.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.31%

-34.15%

+2.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.78%

-76.74%

+30.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.51%

-76.74%

+20.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-64.43%

-25.73%

-38.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.51%

-15.26%

-28.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.12%

15.69%

-10.57%

Volatility

C vs. META - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Citigroup Inc. (C) is 8.43%, while Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) has a volatility of 10.48%. This indicates that C experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than META based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CMETADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.43%

10.48%

-2.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.84%

26.95%

-4.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.19%

35.56%

-7.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.18%

44.05%

-14.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.23%

38.69%

-5.46%

Dividends

C vs. META - Dividend Comparison

C's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, more than META's 0.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
C
Citigroup Inc.
1.80%1.99%3.10%4.04%4.51%3.38%3.31%2.40%2.96%1.29%0.71%0.31%
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
0.36%0.32%0.34%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

C vs. META - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Citigroup Inc. and Meta Platforms, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


20.00B30.00B40.00B50.00B60.00B20222023202420252026
44.14B
56.31B
(C) Total Revenue
(META) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

C vs. META - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Citigroup Inc. and Meta Platforms, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
49.3%
81.9%
Portfolio components
C - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Citigroup Inc. reported a gross profit of 21.76B and revenue of 44.14B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.3%.

META - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported a gross profit of 46.09B and revenue of 56.31B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.9%.

C - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Citigroup Inc. reported an operating income of 7.52B and revenue of 44.14B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.0%.

META - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported an operating income of 22.87B and revenue of 56.31B, resulting in an operating margin of 40.6%.

C - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Citigroup Inc. reported a net income of 5.79B and revenue of 44.14B, resulting in a net margin of 13.1%.

META - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported a net income of 26.77B and revenue of 56.31B, resulting in a net margin of 47.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


C and META have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

META has higher volatility (10.48%) compared to C (8.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, C dropped -98.00% vs META's -76.74%.

C currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs -0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for C and META

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer