PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
C vs. LYB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

C vs. LYB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Citigroup Inc. (C) and LyondellBasell Industries N.V. (LYB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, C achieves a 14.65% return, which is significantly lower than LYB's 52.35% return. Over the past 10 years, C has outperformed LYB with an annualized return of 14.65%, while LYB has yielded a comparatively lower 5.29% annualized return.


C

1D
-1.98%
1M
5.51%
YTD
14.65%
6M
22.88%
1Y
73.11%
3Y*
45.73%
5Y*
14.66%
10Y*
14.65%

LYB

1D
-2.54%
1M
-9.18%
YTD
52.35%
6M
52.17%
1Y
22.89%
3Y*
-4.03%
5Y*
-4.78%
10Y*
5.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

C vs. LYB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
C
Citigroup Inc.
14.65%70.38%41.93%18.98%-22.09%0.93%-19.70%57.82%-28.49%27.03%
LYB
LyondellBasell Industries N.V.
52.35%-35.96%-17.38%20.70%-0.98%5.07%2.64%44.63%-21.69%33.72%

Correlation

The correlation between C and LYB is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2010

0.50

The correlation between C and LYB shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.50 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

C:

$8.65

LYB:

-$3.19

PS Ratio

C:

1.43

LYB:

0.70

Total Revenue (TTM)

C:

$171.19B

LYB:

$22.48B

Gross Profit (TTM)

C:

$77.85B

LYB:

-$4.33B

EBITDA (TTM)

C:

$24.12B

LYB:

$935.00M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

C vs. LYB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

C
C Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
C Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
C Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
C Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
C Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
C Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

LYB
LYB Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
LYB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYB Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
LYB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYB Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

C vs. LYB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Citigroup Inc. (C) and LyondellBasell Industries N.V. (LYB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CLYBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.13

+0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.22

0.71

+4.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.04

1.26

+13.78

C vs. LYB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current C Sharpe Ratio is 2.74, which is higher than the LYB Sharpe Ratio of 0.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of C and LYB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CLYBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.74

0.54

+2.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

-0.15

+0.65

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.14

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

0.40

-0.25

Drawdowns

C vs. LYB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum C drawdown since its inception was -98.00%, which is greater than LYB's maximum drawdown of -63.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for C and LYB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CLYBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.00%

-63.26%

-34.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.76%

-35.45%

+20.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.31%

-55.35%

+24.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.65%

-55.35%

+8.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.51%

-63.26%

+6.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-64.64%

-28.50%

-36.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.51%

-15.11%

-28.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.11%

19.88%

-14.77%

Volatility

C vs. LYB - Volatility Comparison

Citigroup Inc. (C) has a higher volatility of 8.48% compared to LyondellBasell Industries N.V. (LYB) at 7.40%. This indicates that C's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LYB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CLYBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.48%

7.40%

+1.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.85%

34.97%

-12.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.19%

46.09%

-17.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.17%

32.84%

-3.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.22%

36.75%

-3.53%

Dividends

C vs. LYB - Dividend Comparison

C's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%, less than LYB's 6.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
C
Citigroup Inc.
1.81%1.99%3.10%4.04%4.51%3.38%3.31%2.40%2.96%1.29%0.71%0.31%
LYB
LyondellBasell Industries N.V.
6.39%12.59%7.10%5.20%11.92%4.81%4.58%20.27%4.81%3.22%3.88%3.50%

Financials

C vs. LYB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Citigroup Inc. and LyondellBasell Industries N.V.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B20222023202420252026
44.14B
0
(C) Total Revenue
(LYB) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


C and LYB have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

C has higher volatility (8.48%) compared to LYB (7.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, C dropped -98.00% vs LYB's -63.26%.

C currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for C and LYB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer