PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
C vs. KNT.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

C vs. KNT.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Citigroup Inc. (C) and K92 Mining Inc. (KNT.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

C is traded in USD, while KNT.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the KNT.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, C achieves a 21.02% return, which is significantly higher than KNT.TO's -2.26% return. Over the past 10 years, C has underperformed KNT.TO with an annualized return of 16.22%, while KNT.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 34.40% annualized return.


C

1D
1.27%
1M
12.68%
YTD
21.02%
6M
26.32%
1Y
82.79%
3Y*
46.87%
5Y*
16.80%
10Y*
16.22%

KNT.TO

1D
1.05%
1M
-21.20%
YTD
-2.26%
6M
1.31%
1Y
39.62%
3Y*
54.22%
5Y*
17.46%
10Y*
34.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

C vs. KNT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
C
Citigroup Inc.
21.02%70.38%41.93%18.98%-22.09%0.93%-19.70%57.82%-28.49%27.03%
KNT.TO
K92 Mining Inc.
-2.26%173.91%22.92%-13.06%0.32%-5.47%170.66%257.59%43.49%-40.29%

Correlation

The correlation between C and KNT.TO is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 10, 2011

0.03

The correlation between C and KNT.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (all time) to 0.15 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

C:

$248.34B

KNT.TO:

CA$5.60B

EPS

C:

$8.65

KNT.TO:

$1.28

PE Ratio

C:

16.17

KNT.TO:

12.69

PS Ratio

C:

1.51

KNT.TO:

5.84

PB Ratio

C:

1.30

KNT.TO:

4.51

Total Revenue (TTM)

C:

$171.19B

KNT.TO:

$685.77M

Gross Profit (TTM)

C:

$77.85B

KNT.TO:

$495.11M

EBITDA (TTM)

C:

$24.12B

KNT.TO:

$499.16M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

C vs. KNT.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

C
C Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
C Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
C Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
C Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
C Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
C Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

KNT.TO
KNT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
KNT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KNT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
KNT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
KNT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
KNT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

C vs. KNT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Citigroup Inc. (C) and K92 Mining Inc. (KNT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CKNT.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.17

+0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.64

1.03

+4.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.25

2.61

+13.63

C vs. KNT.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current C Sharpe Ratio is 2.93, which is higher than the KNT.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of C and KNT.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

C vs. KNT.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum C drawdown since its inception was -98.00%, which is greater than KNT.TO's maximum drawdown of -92.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for C and KNT.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CKNT.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.00%

-92.77%

-5.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.76%

-38.65%

+23.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.31%

-38.65%

+7.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.53%

-58.43%

+13.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.51%

-80.08%

+23.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-62.68%

-33.27%

-29.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.51%

-47.06%

+3.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.12%

15.21%

-10.09%

Volatility

C vs. KNT.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Citigroup Inc. (C) is 8.30%, while K92 Mining Inc. (KNT.TO) has a volatility of 18.25%. This indicates that C experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KNT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CKNT.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.30%

18.25%

-9.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.09%

40.03%

-16.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.37%

50.85%

-22.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.20%

49.59%

-20.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.23%

58.57%

-25.34%

Dividends

C vs. KNT.TO - Dividend Comparison

C's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%, while KNT.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
C
Citigroup Inc.
1.72%1.99%3.10%4.04%4.51%3.38%3.31%2.40%2.96%1.29%0.71%0.31%
KNT.TO
K92 Mining Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

C vs. KNT.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Citigroup Inc. and K92 Mining Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B20222023202420252026
44.14B
232.41M
(C) Total Revenue
(KNT.TO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

C vs. KNT.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Citigroup Inc. and K92 Mining Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
49.3%
73.5%
Portfolio components
C - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Citigroup Inc. reported a gross profit of 21.76B and revenue of 44.14B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.3%.

KNT.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, K92 Mining Inc. reported a gross profit of 170.77M and revenue of 232.41M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 73.5%.

C - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Citigroup Inc. reported an operating income of 7.52B and revenue of 44.14B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.0%.

KNT.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, K92 Mining Inc. reported an operating income of 165.19M and revenue of 232.41M, resulting in an operating margin of 71.1%.

C - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Citigroup Inc. reported a net income of 5.79B and revenue of 44.14B, resulting in a net margin of 13.1%.

KNT.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, K92 Mining Inc. reported a net income of 114.72M and revenue of 232.41M, resulting in a net margin of 49.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


C and KNT.TO have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for C and KNT.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer