BZQ vs. MUU

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

BZQ (ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped) and MUU (Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds - BZQ tracks the MSCI Brazil 25-50 (-200%) while MUU tracks the Micron Technology, Inc. (200% Daily). Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.21, they often move in opposite directions. BZQ charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for MUU.

Performance

BZQ vs. MUU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped (BZQ) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BZQ

• 1D: -2.44%
• 1M: 11.18%
• YTD: -21.77%
• 6M: -23.48%
• 1Y: -46.45%
• 3Y*: -19.84%
• 5Y*: -21.85%
• 10Y*: -36.54%

MUU

• 1D: 31.07%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BZQ vs. MUU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
BZQ ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped	1.78%
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares	14.65%

Correlation

The correlation between BZQ and MUU is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2026	-0.21

Return for Risk

BZQ vs. MUU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BZQ

BZQ Risk / Return Rank: 3
BZQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
BZQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
BZQ Omega Ratio Rank: 2
BZQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
BZQ Martin Ratio Rank: 4

MUU

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BZQ vs. MUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped (BZQ) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BZQ	MUU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.93	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.40	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.85	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.71	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.11	—	—

Drawdowns

BZQ vs. MUU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BZQ drawdown since its inception was -99.82%, which is greater than MUU's maximum drawdown of -26.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BZQ and MUU.

Drawdown Indicators

	BZQ	MUU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.82%	-26.63%	-73.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-65.20%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-77.31%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-88.65%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-99.19%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.74%	-3.84%	-95.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-84.57%	-11.62%	-72.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	41.72%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BZQ	MUU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.14%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	39.57%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	50.07%	307.99%	-257.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	55.29%	307.99%	-252.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	66.73%	307.99%	-241.26%

BZQ vs. MUU - Expense Ratio Comparison

BZQ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than MUU's 1.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

BZQ vs. MUU - Dividend Comparison

BZQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.06%, more than MUU's 0.17% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BZQ ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped	7.06%	5.96%	3.26%	4.51%	0.22%	0.00%	0.21%	2.13%	0.28%
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares	0.17%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BZQ and MUU in my portfolio?

BZQ and MUU have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BZQ or MUU?

On fees, BZQ is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BZQ or MUU?

BZQ is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for MUU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BZQ or MUU?

BZQ has the higher dividend yield at 7.06%, compared with 0.17% for MUU.

What is the main difference between BZQ and MUU?

BZQ tracks MSCI Brazil 25-50 (-200%), while MUU tracks Micron Technology, Inc. (200% Daily). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BZQ and 1.01% for MUU.