PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BZQ vs. VTI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BZQ vs. VTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped (BZQ) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BZQ achieves a -31.18% return, which is significantly lower than VTI's 12.18% return. Over the past 10 years, BZQ has underperformed VTI with an annualized return of -34.28%, while VTI has yielded a comparatively higher 14.66% annualized return.


BZQ

1D
1.68%
1M
-11.20%
6M
-3.41%
YTD
-31.18%
1Y
-55.71%
3Y*
-23.89%
5Y*
-25.86%
10Y*
-34.28%
ALL TIME*
-29.38%

VTI

1D
1.53%
1M
1.38%
6M
9.81%
YTD
12.18%
1Y
23.70%
3Y*
20.38%
5Y*
12.06%
10Y*
14.66%
ALL TIME*
9.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$82.44K$121.14K$200.97K
$1.08B$1.16B$1.24B

BZQ vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BZQ
ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped
-31.18%-57.90%98.84%-49.11%-44.20%6.45%-52.88%-48.20%-21.52%-49.73%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
12.18%17.10%23.81%26.05%-19.52%25.68%21.08%30.67%-5.23%21.21%

Correlation

The correlation between BZQ and VTI is -0.52, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

-0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

-0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2009

-0.53

The correlation between BZQ and VTI shifts across timeframes, from -0.53 (all time) to -0.41 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BZQ vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BZQ
BZQ Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
BZQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BZQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
BZQ Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
BZQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BZQ Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

VTI
VTI Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
VTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTI Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
VTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTI Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BZQ vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped (BZQ) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BZQVTIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.80

1.32

-0.53

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.87

2.67

-3.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.28

11.50

-12.78

BZQ vs. VTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BZQ Sharpe Ratio is -1.12, which is lower than the VTI Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BZQ and VTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BZQ vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BZQ drawdown since its inception was -99.82%, which is greater than VTI's maximum drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BZQ and VTI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BZQVTIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.82%

-55.45%

-44.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-64.18%

-8.92%

-55.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-77.31%

-19.30%

-58.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-88.65%

-25.36%

-63.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-98.92%

-35.00%

-63.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.77%

0.00%

-99.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-84.66%

-7.98%

-76.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

44.64%

2.07%

+42.57%

Volatility

BZQ vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison

ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped (BZQ) has a higher volatility of 13.59% compared to Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) at 3.78%. This indicates that BZQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BZQVTIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.59%

3.78%

+9.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.33%

10.33%

+28.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.09%

13.08%

+37.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

54.82%

17.53%

+37.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

66.55%

18.31%

+48.24%

BZQ vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

BZQ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

BZQ vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison

BZQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.02%, more than VTI's 1.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BZQ
ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped
8.02%5.96%3.26%4.51%0.22%0.00%0.21%2.13%0.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
1.04%1.12%1.27%1.44%1.66%1.21%1.42%1.78%2.04%1.71%1.92%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


BZQ and VTI have a correlation of -0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BZQ has higher volatility (13.59%) compared to VTI (3.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BZQ dropped -99.82% vs VTI's -55.45%.

On 10-year performance, VTI leads with 14.66% vs -34.28% for BZQ. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VTI has been the lower-risk option at 3.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VTI has performed better with a 14.66% return vs -34.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BZQ.

BZQ has the higher dividend yield at 8.02%, compared with 1.04% for VTI.

BZQ is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while VTI is Large Cap Blend Equities. BZQ tracks MSCI Brazil 25-50 (-200%), while VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BZQ and 0.03% for VTI.

VTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs -1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BZQ and VTI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer