PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BYDDY vs. GLDM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BYDDY vs. GLDM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BYD Company Limited ADR (BYDDY) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BYDDY achieves a -8.48% return, which is significantly lower than GLDM's -2.40% return.


BYDDY

1D
0.66%
1M
-13.95%
YTD
-8.48%
6M
-10.33%
1Y
-36.06%
3Y*
1.04%
5Y*
4.37%
10Y*
20.45%

GLDM

1D
0.11%
1M
-10.20%
YTD
-2.40%
6M
-2.09%
1Y
24.17%
3Y*
29.27%
5Y*
17.41%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BYDDY vs. GLDM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
BYDDY
BYD Company Limited ADR
-8.48%7.97%24.81%13.06%-27.17%28.02%432.95%-21.04%5.53%
GLDM
SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust
-2.40%64.20%27.08%13.04%-0.47%-4.01%25.10%18.10%1.75%

Correlation

The correlation between BYDDY and GLDM is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2018

0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BYDDY vs. GLDM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BYDDY
BYDDY Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
BYDDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BYDDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
BYDDY Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
BYDDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
BYDDY Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

GLDM
GLDM Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
GLDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLDM Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
GLDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLDM Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BYDDY vs. GLDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BYD Company Limited ADR (BYDDY) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BYDDYGLDMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.84

1.19

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-1.03

1.00

-2.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.59

2.87

-4.46

BYDDY vs. GLDM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BYDDY Sharpe Ratio is -0.98, which is lower than the GLDM Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BYDDY and GLDM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BYDDY vs. GLDM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BYDDY drawdown since its inception was -97.38%, which is greater than GLDM's maximum drawdown of -24.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BYDDY and GLDM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BYDDYGLDMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.38%

-24.35%

-73.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.21%

-24.35%

-10.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-43.68%

-24.35%

-19.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.16%

-24.35%

-23.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-43.25%

-21.96%

-21.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-63.73%

-6.27%

-57.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.19%

8.44%

+15.75%

Volatility

BYDDY vs. GLDM - Volatility Comparison

BYD Company Limited ADR (BYDDY) has a higher volatility of 8.66% compared to SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) at 7.73%. This indicates that BYDDY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BYDDYGLDMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.66%

7.73%

+0.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.41%

23.93%

+4.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.02%

27.15%

+9.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

45.80%

18.13%

+27.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.24%

16.98%

+30.26%

Dividends

BYDDY vs. GLDM - Dividend Comparison

BYDDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, while GLDM has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BYDDY
BYD Company Limited ADR
0.48%1.45%1.26%0.60%0.07%0.07%0.03%0.47%0.28%0.52%1.92%
GLDM
SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BYDDY and GLDM have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BYDDY has higher volatility (8.66%) compared to GLDM (7.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BYDDY dropped -97.38% vs GLDM's -24.35%.

GLDM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.90 vs -0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BYDDY and GLDM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer