BYBU.L vs. 100D.L
BYBU.L (Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF-C USD) and 100D.L (Amundi FTSE 100 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BYBU.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Buyback NTR, while 100D.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE AllSh TR GBP. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BYBU.L returned 10.16%/yr vs 10.61%/yr for 100D.L. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BYBU.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for 100D.L.
Performance
BYBU.L vs. 100D.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
BYBU.L is traded in USD, while 100D.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the 100D.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BYBU.L achieves a 8.18% return, which is significantly higher than 100D.L's 5.78% return.
BYBU.L
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- 4.76%
- YTD
- 8.18%
- 6M
- 9.93%
- 1Y
- 22.65%
- 3Y*
- 18.64%
- 5Y*
- 10.16%
- 10Y*
- —
100D.L
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 0.84%
- YTD
- 5.78%
- 6M
- 9.06%
- 1Y
- 20.16%
- 3Y*
- 17.71%
- 5Y*
- 10.61%
- 10Y*
- —
BYBU.L vs. 100D.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BYBU.L Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF-C USD | 8.18% | 17.38% | 14.97% | 15.90% | -12.83% | 37.69% | 3.27% | 10.59% |
100D.L Amundi FTSE 100 UCITS ETF | 5.78% | 35.26% | 7.50% | 13.03% | -6.40% | 16.93% | -9.08% | 5.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between BYBU.L and 100D.L is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2019 | 0.35 |
Over the past year, BYBU.L and 100D.L have become more correlated (0.56) than their long-term average of 0.35, meaning their price movements have been converging.
BYBU.L vs. 100D.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BYBU.L
100D.L
Financial Services
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Energy
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
Financial Services
BYBU.L
100D.L
Technology
BYBU.L
100D.L
Consumer Cyclical
BYBU.L
100D.L
Industrials
BYBU.L
100D.L
Healthcare
BYBU.L
100D.L
Energy
BYBU.L
100D.L
Communication Services
BYBU.L
100D.L
Consumer Defensive
BYBU.L
100D.L
Basic Materials
BYBU.L
100D.L
Real Estate
BYBU.L
100D.L
Utilities
BYBU.L
100D.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BYBU.L vs. 100D.L — Risk / Return Rank
BYBU.L
100D.L
BYBU.L vs. 100D.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF-C USD (BYBU.L) and Amundi FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (100D.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BYBU.L | 100D.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.27 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.34 | 2.05 | +2.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.04 | 6.95 | +5.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BYBU.L | 100D.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.90 | 1.50 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 | 0.64 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.14 | 0.46 | +0.68 |
Drawdowns
BYBU.L vs. 100D.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BYBU.L drawdown since its inception was -28.64%, smaller than the maximum 100D.L drawdown of -42.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BYBU.L and 100D.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BYBU.L | 100D.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.64% | -42.39% | +13.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.19% | -9.79% | +4.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.21% | -13.78% | -5.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.11% | -25.99% | +3.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -4.41% | +4.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.86% | -6.17% | +1.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.88% | 2.89% | -1.01% |
Volatility
BYBU.L vs. 100D.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF-C USD (BYBU.L) is 3.55%, while Amundi FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (100D.L) has a volatility of 4.95%. This indicates that BYBU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 100D.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BYBU.L | 100D.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.55% | 4.95% | -1.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.14% | 11.24% | -3.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.86% | 13.36% | -1.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.25% | 16.62% | +4.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.74% | 19.31% | +8.43% |
BYBU.L vs. 100D.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
BYBU.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than 100D.L's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BYBU.L vs. 100D.L - Dividend Comparison
BYBU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while 100D.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.57%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
100D.L Amundi FTSE 100 UCITS ETF | 3.57% | 3.78% | 4.17% | 3.90% | 3.80% | 3.39% | 3.11% | 4.30% |
BYBU.L Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF-C USD | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BYBU.L and 100D.L have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, 100D.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
100D.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for BYBU.L.
BYBU.L is categorized as S&P 500, while 100D.L is Europe Equities. BYBU.L tracks S&P 500 Buyback NTR, while 100D.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for BYBU.L and 0.14% for 100D.L.
Find the right allocation for BYBU.L and 100D.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer