BXSL vs. BBDC
BXSL (Blackstone Secured Lending Fund) and BBDC (Barings BDC, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Financial Services sector — BXSL in Asset Management, BBDC in Credit Services. Over the past 3 years, BXSL returned 7.49%/yr vs 14.63%/yr for BBDC. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BXSL vs. BBDC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BXSL achieves a -6.39% return, which is significantly lower than BBDC's -2.86% return.
BXSL
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- -1.08%
- YTD
- -6.39%
- 6M
- -9.95%
- 1Y
- -15.35%
- 3Y*
- 7.49%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BBDC
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.43%
- YTD
- -2.86%
- 6M
- -1.25%
- 1Y
- 4.66%
- 3Y*
- 14.63%
- 5Y*
- 6.45%
- 10Y*
- —
BXSL vs. BBDC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BXSL Blackstone Secured Lending Fund | -6.39% | -9.36% | 29.02% | 37.82% | -26.03% | 32.04% |
BBDC Barings BDC, Inc. | -2.86% | 8.84% | 23.86% | 18.53% | -18.59% | 2.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between BXSL and BBDC is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2021 | 0.50 |
Over the past year, BXSL and BBDC have become more correlated (0.70) than their long-term average of 0.50, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
BXSL:
$5.54B
BBDC:
$878.49M
BXSL:
$1.80
BBDC:
$0.66
BXSL:
13.26
BBDC:
12.71
BXSL:
7.76
BBDC:
5.06
BXSL:
0.91
BBDC:
0.76
BXSL:
$706.98M
BBDC:
$174.30M
BXSL:
$831.73M
BBDC:
$149.47M
BXSL:
$525.53M
BBDC:
$90.27M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BXSL vs. BBDC — Risk / Return Rank
BXSL
BBDC
BXSL vs. BBDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blackstone Secured Lending Fund (BXSL) and Barings BDC, Inc. (BBDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BXSL | BBDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.05 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.68 | 0.33 | -1.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.01 | 0.73 | -1.75 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BXSL vs. BBDC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BXSL drawdown since its inception was -36.80%, smaller than the maximum BBDC drawdown of -48.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BXSL and BBDC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BXSL | BBDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.80% | -48.45% | +11.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.47% | -12.28% | -11.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.21% | -24.51% | +0.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.55% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.54% | -6.42% | -14.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.15% | -7.98% | -6.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.73% | 5.59% | +10.14% |
Volatility
BXSL vs. BBDC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Blackstone Secured Lending Fund (BXSL) is 5.42%, while Barings BDC, Inc. (BBDC) has a volatility of 6.34%. This indicates that BXSL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBDC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BXSL | BBDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.42% | 6.34% | -0.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.42% | 15.12% | +1.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.20% | 18.60% | +1.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.85% | 19.39% | +4.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.85% | 24.21% | -0.36% |
Dividends
BXSL vs. BBDC - Dividend Comparison
BXSL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.91%, which matches BBDC's 12.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBDC Barings BDC, Inc. | 12.99% | 12.96% | 10.87% | 11.89% | 11.66% | 7.44% | 7.07% | 5.25% | 21.24% |
BXSL Blackstone Secured Lending Fund | 12.91% | 11.70% | 9.53% | 10.64% | 13.02% | 1.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
BXSL vs. BBDC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Blackstone Secured Lending Fund and Barings BDC, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
BXSL and BBDC have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BBDC has higher volatility (6.34%) compared to BXSL (5.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BXSL dropped -36.80% vs BBDC's -48.45%.
BBDC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.22 vs -0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BXSL and BBDC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer