PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BXSL vs. BBDC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BXSL vs. BBDC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Blackstone Secured Lending Fund (BXSL) and Barings BDC, Inc. (BBDC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BXSL achieves a -6.39% return, which is significantly lower than BBDC's -2.86% return.


BXSL

1D
-0.21%
1M
-1.08%
YTD
-6.39%
6M
-9.95%
1Y
-15.35%
3Y*
7.49%
5Y*
10Y*

BBDC

1D
0.00%
1M
0.43%
YTD
-2.86%
6M
-1.25%
1Y
4.66%
3Y*
14.63%
5Y*
6.45%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BXSL vs. BBDC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BXSL
Blackstone Secured Lending Fund
-6.39%-9.36%29.02%37.82%-26.03%32.04%
BBDC
Barings BDC, Inc.
-2.86%8.84%23.86%18.53%-18.59%2.54%

Correlation

The correlation between BXSL and BBDC is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2021

0.50

Over the past year, BXSL and BBDC have become more correlated (0.70) than their long-term average of 0.50, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BXSL:

$5.54B

BBDC:

$878.49M

EPS

BXSL:

$1.80

BBDC:

$0.66

PE Ratio

BXSL:

13.26

BBDC:

12.71

PS Ratio

BXSL:

7.76

BBDC:

5.06

PB Ratio

BXSL:

0.91

BBDC:

0.76

Total Revenue (TTM)

BXSL:

$706.98M

BBDC:

$174.30M

Gross Profit (TTM)

BXSL:

$831.73M

BBDC:

$149.47M

EBITDA (TTM)

BXSL:

$525.53M

BBDC:

$90.27M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BXSL vs. BBDC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BXSL
BXSL Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
BXSL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BXSL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
BXSL Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
BXSL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
BXSL Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

BBDC
BBDC Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
BBDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBDC Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
BBDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBDC Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BXSL vs. BBDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blackstone Secured Lending Fund (BXSL) and Barings BDC, Inc. (BBDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BXSLBBDCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.88

1.05

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.68

0.33

-1.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.01

0.73

-1.75

BXSL vs. BBDC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BXSL Sharpe Ratio is -0.79, which is lower than the BBDC Sharpe Ratio of 0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BXSL and BBDC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BXSL vs. BBDC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BXSL drawdown since its inception was -36.80%, smaller than the maximum BBDC drawdown of -48.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BXSL and BBDC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BXSLBBDCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.80%

-48.45%

+11.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.47%

-12.28%

-11.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.21%

-24.51%

+0.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.54%

-6.42%

-14.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.15%

-7.98%

-6.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.73%

5.59%

+10.14%

Volatility

BXSL vs. BBDC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Blackstone Secured Lending Fund (BXSL) is 5.42%, while Barings BDC, Inc. (BBDC) has a volatility of 6.34%. This indicates that BXSL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBDC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BXSLBBDCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.42%

6.34%

-0.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.42%

15.12%

+1.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.20%

18.60%

+1.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.85%

19.39%

+4.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.85%

24.21%

-0.36%

Dividends

BXSL vs. BBDC - Dividend Comparison

BXSL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.91%, which matches BBDC's 12.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BBDC
Barings BDC, Inc.
12.99%12.96%10.87%11.89%11.66%7.44%7.07%5.25%21.24%
BXSL
Blackstone Secured Lending Fund
12.91%11.70%9.53%10.64%13.02%1.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

BXSL vs. BBDC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Blackstone Secured Lending Fund and Barings BDC, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M300.00M2022202320242025202600
(BXSL) Total Revenue
(BBDC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


BXSL and BBDC have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BBDC has higher volatility (6.34%) compared to BXSL (5.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BXSL dropped -36.80% vs BBDC's -48.45%.

BBDC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.22 vs -0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BXSL and BBDC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer