PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BXFIX vs. SAMBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BXFIX vs. SAMBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MassMutual Global Floating Rate Fund (BXFIX) and Virtus Seix Floating Rate High Income Fund (SAMBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BXFIX achieves a 0.56% return, which is significantly lower than SAMBX's 2.69% return.


BXFIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.33%
YTD
0.56%
6M
1.06%
1Y
3.45%
3Y*
5.85%
5Y*
10Y*

SAMBX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.72%
YTD
2.69%
6M
3.96%
1Y
7.45%
3Y*
7.65%
5Y*
5.54%
10Y*
4.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BXFIX vs. SAMBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BXFIX
MassMutual Global Floating Rate Fund
0.56%4.72%6.83%10.26%-5.65%0.41%
SAMBX
Virtus Seix Floating Rate High Income Fund
2.69%5.88%7.03%11.21%-0.86%0.39%

Correlation

The correlation between BXFIX and SAMBX is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2021

0.62

The correlation between BXFIX and SAMBX shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (3 years) to 0.62 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BXFIX vs. SAMBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BXFIX
BXFIX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
BXFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BXFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
BXFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
BXFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
BXFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

SAMBX
SAMBX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
SAMBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SAMBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
SAMBX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
SAMBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
SAMBX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BXFIX vs. SAMBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MassMutual Global Floating Rate Fund (BXFIX) and Virtus Seix Floating Rate High Income Fund (SAMBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BXFIXSAMBXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

2.22

-0.76

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.01

9.56

-7.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.96

30.52

-24.56

BXFIX vs. SAMBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BXFIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is lower than the SAMBX Sharpe Ratio of 3.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BXFIX and SAMBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BXFIXSAMBXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.39

3.06

-1.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.89

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.24

1.20

+0.03

Drawdowns

BXFIX vs. SAMBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BXFIX drawdown since its inception was -9.12%, smaller than the maximum SAMBX drawdown of -24.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BXFIX and SAMBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BXFIXSAMBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.12%

-24.74%

+15.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.72%

-0.78%

-0.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.92%

-2.95%

+0.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.51%

-1.58%

+0.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.58%

0.24%

+0.34%

Volatility

BXFIX vs. SAMBX - Volatility Comparison

MassMutual Global Floating Rate Fund (BXFIX) and Virtus Seix Floating Rate High Income Fund (SAMBX) have volatilities of 0.65% and 0.65%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BXFIXSAMBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.65%

0.65%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.97%

1.79%

+0.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.51%

2.44%

+0.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.02%

2.95%

+0.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.02%

3.94%

-0.92%

BXFIX vs. SAMBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BXFIX has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than SAMBX's 0.64% expense ratio.


Dividends

BXFIX vs. SAMBX - Dividend Comparison

BXFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.29%, less than SAMBX's 7.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BXFIX
MassMutual Global Floating Rate Fund
7.29%7.58%7.30%6.10%4.35%0.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SAMBX
Virtus Seix Floating Rate High Income Fund
7.42%7.78%8.21%8.21%5.34%3.03%4.03%5.28%5.15%4.28%4.79%4.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


BXFIX and SAMBX have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SAMBX has higher volatility (0.65%) compared to BXFIX (0.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BXFIX dropped -9.12% vs SAMBX's -24.74%.

SAMBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.06 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BXFIX and SAMBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer