PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BWZ vs. IGOV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BWZ vs. IGOV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Short Term International Treasury Bond ETF (BWZ) and iShares International Treasury Bond ETF (IGOV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BWZ achieves a -0.10% return, which is significantly lower than IGOV's 0.34% return. Over the past 10 years, BWZ has outperformed IGOV with an annualized return of -0.44%, while IGOV has yielded a comparatively lower -1.30% annualized return.


BWZ

1D
0.18%
1M
-0.63%
YTD
-0.10%
6M
1.00%
1Y
-0.05%
3Y*
2.76%
5Y*
-1.78%
10Y*
-0.44%

IGOV

1D
0.07%
1M
-0.05%
YTD
0.34%
6M
0.74%
1Y
0.69%
3Y*
2.85%
5Y*
-4.22%
10Y*
-1.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BWZ vs. IGOV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BWZ
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Short Term International Treasury Bond ETF
-0.10%10.47%-5.31%2.97%-10.56%-6.85%6.47%0.99%-3.36%10.18%
IGOV
iShares International Treasury Bond ETF
0.34%9.96%-6.50%5.57%-22.07%-9.25%10.88%3.76%-2.60%11.38%

Correlation

The correlation between BWZ and IGOV is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2009

0.76

The correlation between BWZ and IGOV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BWZ vs. IGOV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BWZ
BWZ Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
BWZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BWZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
BWZ Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
BWZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
BWZ Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

IGOV
IGOV Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
IGOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGOV Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
IGOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGOV Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BWZ vs. IGOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Short Term International Treasury Bond ETF (BWZ) and iShares International Treasury Bond ETF (IGOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BWZIGOVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.01

0.09

-0.09

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.04

0.18

-0.14

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.02

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.13

0.26

-0.13

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.31

0.63

-0.32

BWZ vs. IGOV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BWZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.01, which is lower than the IGOV Sharpe Ratio of 0.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BWZ and IGOV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BWZIGOVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

0.09

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.24

-0.43

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.06

-0.15

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.02

0.02

-0.04

Drawdowns

BWZ vs. IGOV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BWZ drawdown since its inception was -34.23%, roughly equal to the maximum IGOV drawdown of -35.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BWZ and IGOV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BWZIGOVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.23%

-35.88%

+1.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.15%

-5.70%

+0.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.60%

-10.65%

+2.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.58%

-33.17%

+9.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.90%

-35.88%

+10.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.99%

-23.37%

+1.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.10%

-11.01%

-5.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.24%

2.41%

-0.17%

Volatility

BWZ vs. IGOV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Short Term International Treasury Bond ETF (BWZ) is 1.79%, while iShares International Treasury Bond ETF (IGOV) has a volatility of 2.71%. This indicates that BWZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IGOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BWZIGOVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.79%

2.71%

-0.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.95%

6.14%

-1.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.95%

8.11%

-1.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.60%

9.95%

-2.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.95%

8.59%

-1.64%

BWZ vs. IGOV - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BWZ and IGOV have an expense ratio of 0.35%.


Dividends

BWZ vs. IGOV - Dividend Comparison

BWZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, more than IGOV's 1.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BWZ
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Short Term International Treasury Bond ETF
2.08%2.05%2.47%1.63%0.44%0.60%0.13%0.43%1.10%0.40%0.13%0.06%
IGOV
iShares International Treasury Bond ETF
1.40%1.41%0.59%0.00%0.11%0.39%0.00%0.24%0.31%0.19%0.69%0.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


BWZ and IGOV have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IGOV has higher volatility (2.71%) compared to BWZ (1.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BWZ dropped -34.23% vs IGOV's -35.88%.

On 10-year performance, BWZ leads with -0.44% vs -1.30% for IGOV. Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. On volatility, BWZ has been the lower-risk option at 1.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, BWZ has performed better with a -0.44% return vs -1.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BWZ and IGOV have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.

BWZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.08%, compared with 1.40% for IGOV.

BWZ tracks Bloomberg Global Treasury (1-3 Y) Customized, while IGOV tracks S&P/Citigroup International Treasury Bond Index Ex-US. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares.

IGOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.09 vs -0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BWZ and IGOV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer