BWZ vs. IGOV
BWZ (SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Short Term International Treasury Bond ETF) and IGOV (iShares International Treasury Bond ETF) are both International Government Bonds funds - BWZ tracks the Bloomberg Global Treasury (1-3 Y) Customized while IGOV tracks the S&P/Citigroup International Treasury Bond Index Ex-US. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, BWZ returned -0.44%/yr vs -1.30%/yr for IGOV. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.35% expense ratio.
Performance
BWZ vs. IGOV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BWZ achieves a -0.10% return, which is significantly lower than IGOV's 0.34% return. Over the past 10 years, BWZ has outperformed IGOV with an annualized return of -0.44%, while IGOV has yielded a comparatively lower -1.30% annualized return.
BWZ
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- -0.63%
- YTD
- -0.10%
- 6M
- 1.00%
- 1Y
- -0.05%
- 3Y*
- 2.76%
- 5Y*
- -1.78%
- 10Y*
- -0.44%
IGOV
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- -0.05%
- YTD
- 0.34%
- 6M
- 0.74%
- 1Y
- 0.69%
- 3Y*
- 2.85%
- 5Y*
- -4.22%
- 10Y*
- -1.30%
BWZ vs. IGOV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BWZ SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Short Term International Treasury Bond ETF | -0.10% | 10.47% | -5.31% | 2.97% | -10.56% | -6.85% | 6.47% | 0.99% | -3.36% | 10.18% |
IGOV iShares International Treasury Bond ETF | 0.34% | 9.96% | -6.50% | 5.57% | -22.07% | -9.25% | 10.88% | 3.76% | -2.60% | 11.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between BWZ and IGOV is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2009 | 0.76 |
The correlation between BWZ and IGOV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BWZ vs. IGOV — Risk / Return Rank
BWZ
IGOV
BWZ vs. IGOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Short Term International Treasury Bond ETF (BWZ) and iShares International Treasury Bond ETF (IGOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BWZ | IGOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.01 | 0.09 | -0.09 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.04 | 0.18 | -0.14 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.02 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.13 | 0.26 | -0.13 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.31 | 0.63 | -0.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BWZ | IGOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 | 0.09 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.24 | -0.43 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.06 | -0.15 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.02 | 0.02 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
BWZ vs. IGOV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BWZ drawdown since its inception was -34.23%, roughly equal to the maximum IGOV drawdown of -35.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BWZ and IGOV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BWZ | IGOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.23% | -35.88% | +1.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.15% | -5.70% | +0.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.60% | -10.65% | +2.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.58% | -33.17% | +9.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.90% | -35.88% | +10.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.99% | -23.37% | +1.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.10% | -11.01% | -5.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.24% | 2.41% | -0.17% |
Volatility
BWZ vs. IGOV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Short Term International Treasury Bond ETF (BWZ) is 1.79%, while iShares International Treasury Bond ETF (IGOV) has a volatility of 2.71%. This indicates that BWZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IGOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BWZ | IGOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.79% | 2.71% | -0.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.95% | 6.14% | -1.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.95% | 8.11% | -1.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.60% | 9.95% | -2.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.95% | 8.59% | -1.64% |
BWZ vs. IGOV - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both BWZ and IGOV have an expense ratio of 0.35%.
Dividends
BWZ vs. IGOV - Dividend Comparison
BWZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, more than IGOV's 1.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BWZ SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Short Term International Treasury Bond ETF | 2.08% | 2.05% | 2.47% | 1.63% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 0.13% | 0.43% | 1.10% | 0.40% | 0.13% | 0.06% |
IGOV iShares International Treasury Bond ETF | 1.40% | 1.41% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.11% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.24% | 0.31% | 0.19% | 0.69% | 0.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BWZ and IGOV have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IGOV has higher volatility (2.71%) compared to BWZ (1.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BWZ dropped -34.23% vs IGOV's -35.88%.
On 10-year performance, BWZ leads with -0.44% vs -1.30% for IGOV. Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. On volatility, BWZ has been the lower-risk option at 1.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, BWZ has performed better with a -0.44% return vs -1.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BWZ and IGOV have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.
BWZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.08%, compared with 1.40% for IGOV.
BWZ tracks Bloomberg Global Treasury (1-3 Y) Customized, while IGOV tracks S&P/Citigroup International Treasury Bond Index Ex-US. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares.
IGOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.09 vs -0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BWZ and IGOV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer