PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BWZ vs. IEI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BWZ vs. IEI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Short Term International Treasury Bond ETF (BWZ) and iShares 3-7 Year Treasury Bond ETF (IEI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BWZ achieves a -0.10% return, which is significantly higher than IEI's -0.29% return. Over the past 10 years, BWZ has underperformed IEI with an annualized return of -0.44%, while IEI has yielded a comparatively higher 1.29% annualized return.


BWZ

1D
0.18%
1M
-0.63%
YTD
-0.10%
6M
1.00%
1Y
-0.05%
3Y*
2.76%
5Y*
-1.78%
10Y*
-0.44%

IEI

1D
-0.01%
1M
-0.27%
YTD
-0.29%
6M
-0.24%
1Y
3.33%
3Y*
3.57%
5Y*
0.31%
10Y*
1.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BWZ vs. IEI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BWZ
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Short Term International Treasury Bond ETF
-0.10%10.47%-5.31%2.97%-10.56%-6.85%6.47%0.99%-3.36%10.18%
IEI
iShares 3-7 Year Treasury Bond ETF
-0.29%6.96%1.81%4.42%-9.51%-2.54%6.95%5.71%1.36%1.22%

Correlation

The correlation between BWZ and IEI is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2009

0.24

Over the past year, BWZ and IEI have become more correlated (0.49) than their long-term average of 0.24, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BWZ vs. IEI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BWZ
BWZ Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
BWZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BWZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
BWZ Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
BWZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
BWZ Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

IEI
IEI Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
IEI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEI Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
IEI Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEI Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BWZ vs. IEI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Short Term International Treasury Bond ETF (BWZ) and iShares 3-7 Year Treasury Bond ETF (IEI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BWZIEIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.01

1.10

-1.11

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.04

1.67

-1.63

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.19

-0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.13

1.25

-1.11

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.31

3.78

-3.47

BWZ vs. IEI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BWZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.01, which is lower than the IEI Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BWZ and IEI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BWZIEIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

1.10

-1.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.24

0.07

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.06

0.33

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.02

0.70

-0.72

Drawdowns

BWZ vs. IEI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BWZ drawdown since its inception was -34.23%, which is greater than IEI's maximum drawdown of -14.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BWZ and IEI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BWZIEIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.23%

-14.60%

-19.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.15%

-2.50%

-2.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.60%

-3.66%

-4.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.58%

-13.88%

-9.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.90%

-14.60%

-10.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.99%

-1.73%

-20.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.10%

-2.67%

-13.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.24%

0.82%

+1.42%

Volatility

BWZ vs. IEI - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Short Term International Treasury Bond ETF (BWZ) has a higher volatility of 1.79% compared to iShares 3-7 Year Treasury Bond ETF (IEI) at 0.92%. This indicates that BWZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IEI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BWZIEIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.79%

0.92%

+0.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.95%

2.15%

+2.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.95%

3.04%

+3.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.60%

4.77%

+2.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.95%

3.93%

+3.02%

BWZ vs. IEI - Expense Ratio Comparison

BWZ has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than IEI's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

BWZ vs. IEI - Dividend Comparison

BWZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, less than IEI's 3.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BWZ
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Short Term International Treasury Bond ETF
2.08%2.05%2.47%1.63%0.44%0.60%0.13%0.43%1.10%0.40%0.13%0.06%
IEI
iShares 3-7 Year Treasury Bond ETF
3.64%3.48%3.18%2.36%1.37%0.73%1.12%2.01%1.95%1.51%1.33%1.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


BWZ and IEI have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BWZ has higher volatility (1.79%) compared to IEI (0.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BWZ dropped -34.23% vs IEI's -14.60%.

On 10-year performance, IEI leads with 1.29% vs -0.44% for BWZ. On fees, IEI is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, IEI has been the lower-risk option at 0.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IEI has performed better with a 1.29% return vs -0.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IEI is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for BWZ.

IEI has the higher dividend yield at 3.64%, compared with 2.08% for BWZ.

BWZ is categorized as International Government Bonds, while IEI is Government Bonds. BWZ tracks Bloomberg Global Treasury (1-3 Y) Customized, while IEI tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 3-7 Year Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for BWZ and 0.15% for IEI.

IEI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.10 vs -0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BWZ and IEI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer