BWZ vs. IEI
BWZ (SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Short Term International Treasury Bond ETF) and IEI (iShares 3-7 Year Treasury Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BWZ is a International Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Global Treasury (1-3 Y) Customized, while IEI is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 3-7 Year Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, BWZ returned -0.44%/yr vs 1.29%/yr for IEI. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BWZ charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for IEI.
Performance
BWZ vs. IEI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BWZ achieves a -0.10% return, which is significantly higher than IEI's -0.29% return. Over the past 10 years, BWZ has underperformed IEI with an annualized return of -0.44%, while IEI has yielded a comparatively higher 1.29% annualized return.
BWZ
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- -0.63%
- YTD
- -0.10%
- 6M
- 1.00%
- 1Y
- -0.05%
- 3Y*
- 2.76%
- 5Y*
- -1.78%
- 10Y*
- -0.44%
IEI
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- -0.27%
- YTD
- -0.29%
- 6M
- -0.24%
- 1Y
- 3.33%
- 3Y*
- 3.57%
- 5Y*
- 0.31%
- 10Y*
- 1.29%
BWZ vs. IEI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BWZ SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Short Term International Treasury Bond ETF | -0.10% | 10.47% | -5.31% | 2.97% | -10.56% | -6.85% | 6.47% | 0.99% | -3.36% | 10.18% |
IEI iShares 3-7 Year Treasury Bond ETF | -0.29% | 6.96% | 1.81% | 4.42% | -9.51% | -2.54% | 6.95% | 5.71% | 1.36% | 1.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between BWZ and IEI is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2009 | 0.24 |
Over the past year, BWZ and IEI have become more correlated (0.49) than their long-term average of 0.24, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BWZ vs. IEI — Risk / Return Rank
BWZ
IEI
BWZ vs. IEI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Short Term International Treasury Bond ETF (BWZ) and iShares 3-7 Year Treasury Bond ETF (IEI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BWZ | IEI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.01 | 1.10 | -1.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.04 | 1.67 | -1.63 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.19 | -0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.13 | 1.25 | -1.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.31 | 3.78 | -3.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BWZ | IEI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 | 1.10 | -1.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.24 | 0.07 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.06 | 0.33 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.02 | 0.70 | -0.72 |
Drawdowns
BWZ vs. IEI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BWZ drawdown since its inception was -34.23%, which is greater than IEI's maximum drawdown of -14.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BWZ and IEI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BWZ | IEI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.23% | -14.60% | -19.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.15% | -2.50% | -2.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.60% | -3.66% | -4.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.58% | -13.88% | -9.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.90% | -14.60% | -10.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.99% | -1.73% | -20.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.10% | -2.67% | -13.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.24% | 0.82% | +1.42% |
Volatility
BWZ vs. IEI - Volatility Comparison
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Short Term International Treasury Bond ETF (BWZ) has a higher volatility of 1.79% compared to iShares 3-7 Year Treasury Bond ETF (IEI) at 0.92%. This indicates that BWZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IEI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BWZ | IEI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.79% | 0.92% | +0.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.95% | 2.15% | +2.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.95% | 3.04% | +3.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.60% | 4.77% | +2.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.95% | 3.93% | +3.02% |
BWZ vs. IEI - Expense Ratio Comparison
BWZ has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than IEI's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
BWZ vs. IEI - Dividend Comparison
BWZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, less than IEI's 3.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BWZ SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Short Term International Treasury Bond ETF | 2.08% | 2.05% | 2.47% | 1.63% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 0.13% | 0.43% | 1.10% | 0.40% | 0.13% | 0.06% |
IEI iShares 3-7 Year Treasury Bond ETF | 3.64% | 3.48% | 3.18% | 2.36% | 1.37% | 0.73% | 1.12% | 2.01% | 1.95% | 1.51% | 1.33% | 1.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BWZ and IEI have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BWZ has higher volatility (1.79%) compared to IEI (0.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BWZ dropped -34.23% vs IEI's -14.60%.
On 10-year performance, IEI leads with 1.29% vs -0.44% for BWZ. On fees, IEI is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, IEI has been the lower-risk option at 0.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IEI has performed better with a 1.29% return vs -0.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IEI is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for BWZ.
IEI has the higher dividend yield at 3.64%, compared with 2.08% for BWZ.
BWZ is categorized as International Government Bonds, while IEI is Government Bonds. BWZ tracks Bloomberg Global Treasury (1-3 Y) Customized, while IEI tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 3-7 Year Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for BWZ and 0.15% for IEI.
IEI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.10 vs -0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BWZ and IEI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer