CCO.TO vs. L.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Cameco Corporation (CCO.TO) and Loblaw Companies Limited (L.TO).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CCO.TO or L.TO.
Key characteristics
| CCO.TO | L.TO | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 29.84% | 43.86% |
| 1Y Return | 23.10% | 50.53% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 29.43% | 24.89% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 43.38% | 23.34% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 14.45% | 15.26% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.54 | 3.10 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.02 | 4.03 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.13 | 1.55 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.68 | 6.12 |
| Martin Ratio | 1.66 | 27.12 |
| Ulcer Index | 13.94% | 1.89% |
| Daily Std Dev | 42.47% | 16.50% |
| Max Drawdown | -83.92% | -65.60% |
| Current Drawdown | -7.43% | -2.41% |
Fundamentals
| CCO.TO | L.TO | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | CA$33.02B | CA$57.23B |
| EPS | CA$0.27 | CA$6.60 |
| PE Ratio | 281.00 | 28.39 |
| PEG Ratio | 1.94 | 3.15 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | CA$2.80B | CA$42.06B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | CA$593.42M | CA$13.75B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | CA$427.12M | CA$4.72B |
Correlation
The correlation between CCO.TO and L.TO is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
CCO.TO vs. L.TO - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, CCO.TO achieves a 29.84% return, which is significantly lower than L.TO's 43.86% return. Over the past 10 years, CCO.TO has underperformed L.TO with an annualized return of 14.45%, while L.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.26% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CCO.TO vs. L.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cameco Corporation (CCO.TO) and Loblaw Companies Limited (L.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CCO.TO vs. L.TO - Dividend Comparison
CCO.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than L.TO's 1.05% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCO.TO Cameco Corporation | 0.12% | 0.16% | 0.29% | 0.22% | 0.35% | 1.21% | 0.39% | 2.76% | 2.28% | 1.82% | 1.84% | 1.72% |
L.TO Loblaw Companies Limited | 1.05% | 1.37% | 1.34% | 1.37% | 2.07% | 1.86% | 0.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CCO.TO vs. L.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CCO.TO drawdown since its inception was -83.92%, which is greater than L.TO's maximum drawdown of -65.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCO.TO and L.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CCO.TO vs. L.TO - Volatility Comparison
Cameco Corporation (CCO.TO) has a higher volatility of 13.22% compared to Loblaw Companies Limited (L.TO) at 5.97%. This indicates that CCO.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than L.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
CCO.TO vs. L.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cameco Corporation and Loblaw Companies Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities