BWTG vs. BDGS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BWTG (Brendan Wood TopGun ETF) and BDGS (Bridges Capital Tactical ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BWTG returned 16.62% vs 13.85% for BDGS. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BWTG charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.87%/yr for BDGS.

Performance

BWTG vs. BDGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brendan Wood TopGun ETF (BWTG) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with BWTG having a 5.71% return and BDGS slightly lower at 5.64%.

BWTG

• 1D: -0.14%
• 1M: 4.13%
• YTD: 5.71%
• 6M: 5.47%
• 1Y: 16.62%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BDGS

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: 1.26%
• YTD: 5.64%
• 6M: 5.65%
• 1Y: 13.85%
• 3Y*: 14.06%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BWTG vs. BDGS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BWTG Brendan Wood TopGun ETF	5.71%	16.45%	20.68%	12.60%
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF	5.64%	10.61%	19.07%	5.66%

Correlation

The correlation between BWTG and BDGS is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.66
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2023	0.63

The correlation between BWTG and BDGS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

BWTG vs. BDGS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BWTG	BDGS
Technology	26.8%	37.4%
Financial Services	22.4%	9.3%
Industrials	14.9%	6.6%
Real Estate	12.0%	1.5%
Healthcare	6.8%	7.5%
Communication Services	4.6%	16.6%
Consumer Defensive	4.3%	4.1%
Consumer Cyclical	4.3%	10.9%
Utilities	3.6%	1.9%
Basic Materials	-	1.5%
Energy	-	2.6%

Return for Risk

BWTG vs. BDGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BWTG

BWTG Risk / Return Rank: 41
BWTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
BWTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
BWTG Omega Ratio Rank: 40
BWTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
BWTG Martin Ratio Rank: 46

BDGS

BDGS Risk / Return Rank: 74
BDGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
BDGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
BDGS Omega Ratio Rank: 78
BDGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
BDGS Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BWTG vs. BDGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brendan Wood TopGun ETF (BWTG) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BWTG	BDGS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.44	2.29	-0.85
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.08	3.40	-1.33
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.47	-0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.68	3.45	-1.77
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.45	16.47	-9.03
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BWTG vs. BDGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BWTG Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is lower than the BDGS Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BWTG and BDGS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BWTG	BDGS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.44	2.29	-0.85
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.61	1.76	-0.15

Drawdowns

BWTG vs. BDGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BWTG drawdown since its inception was -13.18%, which is greater than BDGS's maximum drawdown of -9.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BWTG and BDGS.

Drawdown Indicators

	BWTG	BDGS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.18%	-9.12%	-4.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.93%	-4.03%	-5.90%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-9.12%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.14%	-0.83%	+0.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.76%	-0.64%	-1.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.24%	0.84%	+1.40%

Volatility

BWTG vs. BDGS - Volatility Comparison

Brendan Wood TopGun ETF (BWTG) has a higher volatility of 4.13% compared to Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) at 1.14%. This indicates that BWTG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BDGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BWTG	BDGS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.13%	1.14%	+2.99%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.31%	4.74%	+4.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.58%	6.08%	+5.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.97%	8.21%	+5.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.97%	8.21%	+5.76%

BWTG vs. BDGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

BWTG has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than BDGS's 0.87% expense ratio.

Dividends

BWTG vs. BDGS - Dividend Comparison

BWTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than BDGS's 0.52% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF	0.52%	0.55%	1.81%	0.84%
BWTG Brendan Wood TopGun ETF	0.33%	0.35%	0.25%	0.19%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BWTG and BDGS in my portfolio?

BWTG and BDGS have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BWTG or BDGS?

BWTG has higher volatility (4.13%) compared to BDGS (1.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BWTG dropped -13.18% vs BDGS's -9.12%.

Which ETF is better, BWTG or BDGS?

On 1-year performance, BWTG leads with 16.62% vs 13.85% for BDGS. On fees, BDGS is cheaper at 0.87% per year. On volatility, BDGS has been the lower-risk option at 1.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BWTG or BDGS?

Over the 1-year period, BWTG has performed better with a 16.62% return vs 13.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BWTG or BDGS?

BDGS is cheaper with a 0.87% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BWTG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BWTG or BDGS?

BDGS has the higher dividend yield at 0.52%, compared with 0.33% for BWTG.

What is the main difference between BWTG and BDGS?

They also come from different issuers: Brendan Wood and Bridges. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BWTG and 0.87% for BDGS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BDGS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.