BWOW vs. WGMI
BWOW (Bitwise Dogecoin ETF) and WGMI (CoinShares Bitcoin Miners ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. BWOW is passively managed, while WGMI is actively managed. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BWOW charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for WGMI.
Performance
BWOW vs. WGMI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BWOW achieves a -37.64% return, which is significantly lower than WGMI's 25.69% return.
BWOW
- 1D
- -0.94%
- 1M
- -16.13%
- 6M
- -47.62%
- YTD
- -37.64%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WGMI
- 1D
- -9.25%
- 1M
- -30.55%
- 6M
- 0.25%
- YTD
- 25.69%
- 1Y
- 83.80%
- 3Y*
- 40.82%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BWOW vs. WGMI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BWOW Bitwise Dogecoin ETF | -37.64% | -22.26% |
WGMI CoinShares Bitcoin Miners ETF | 25.69% | -12.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between BWOW and WGMI is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 26, 2025 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BWOW vs. WGMI — Risk / Return Rank
BWOW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
WGMI
BWOW vs. WGMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise Dogecoin ETF (BWOW) and CoinShares Bitcoin Miners ETF (WGMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BWOW | WGMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.21 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.65 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 3.27 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BWOW vs. WGMI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BWOW drawdown since its inception was -53.87%, smaller than the maximum WGMI drawdown of -85.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BWOW and WGMI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BWOW | WGMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.87% | -85.76% | +31.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -50.94% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -62.79% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -53.00% | -33.29% | -19.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.40% | -42.11% | +9.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 25.70% | — |
Volatility
BWOW vs. WGMI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BWOW | WGMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 21.31% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 56.58% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 70.56% | 78.03% | -7.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 70.56% | 81.56% | -11.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 70.56% | 81.56% | -11.00% |
BWOW vs. WGMI - Expense Ratio Comparison
BWOW has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than WGMI's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
BWOW vs. WGMI - Dividend Comparison
Neither BWOW nor WGMI has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BWOW Bitwise Dogecoin ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WGMI CoinShares Bitcoin Miners ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.22% | 0.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BWOW and WGMI have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BWOW is cheaper at 0.34% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BWOW is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for WGMI.
BWOW and WGMI have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Bitwise and CoinShares. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for BWOW and 0.75% for WGMI.
Find the right allocation for BWOW and WGMI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer