PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BWMN vs. VSEC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BWMN vs. VSEC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. (BWMN) and VSE Corporation (VSEC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BWMN achieves a -0.91% return, which is significantly lower than VSEC's 6.56% return.


BWMN

1D
3.09%
1M
-3.76%
YTD
-0.91%
6M
-7.81%
1Y
26.14%
3Y*
4.92%
5Y*
18.85%
10Y*

VSEC

1D
4.49%
1M
3.66%
YTD
6.56%
6M
7.49%
1Y
40.56%
3Y*
57.12%
5Y*
30.59%
10Y*
19.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BWMN vs. VSEC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BWMN
Bowman Consulting Group Ltd.
-0.91%32.34%-29.76%62.56%2.85%51.75%
VSEC
VSE Corporation
6.56%82.26%47.93%39.19%-22.35%39.20%

Correlation

The correlation between BWMN and VSEC is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2021

0.29

Over the past year, BWMN and VSEC have become more correlated (0.49) than their long-term average of 0.29, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BWMN:

$538.36M

VSEC:

$5.12B

EPS

BWMN:

$0.64

VSEC:

$2.73

PE Ratio

BWMN:

51.51

VSEC:

67.39

PEG Ratio

BWMN:

0.11

VSEC:

0.95

PS Ratio

BWMN:

1.45

VSEC:

3.59

PB Ratio

BWMN:

2.15

VSEC:

1.92

Total Revenue (TTM)

BWMN:

$377.09M

VSEC:

$1.18B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BWMN:

$175.89M

VSEC:

$105.32M

EBITDA (TTM)

BWMN:

$42.71M

VSEC:

$128.59M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BWMN vs. VSEC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BWMN
BWMN Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
BWMN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BWMN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
BWMN Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
BWMN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
BWMN Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

VSEC
VSEC Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
VSEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSEC Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
VSEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSEC Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BWMN vs. VSEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. (BWMN) and VSE Corporation (VSEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BWMNVSECDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.18

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.66

1.34

-0.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.30

3.86

-2.56

BWMN vs. VSEC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BWMN Sharpe Ratio is 0.57, which is comparable to the VSEC Sharpe Ratio of 0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BWMN and VSEC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BWMNVSECDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

0.76

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

0.67

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.27

+0.12

Drawdowns

BWMN vs. VSEC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BWMN drawdown since its inception was -56.21%, smaller than the maximum VSEC drawdown of -76.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BWMN and VSEC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BWMNVSECDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.21%

-76.09%

+19.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.93%

-30.31%

-9.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-56.21%

-30.31%

-25.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.21%

-47.58%

-8.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-76.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.36%

-19.21%

-7.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.65%

-30.68%

+10.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.18%

10.54%

+9.64%

Volatility

BWMN vs. VSEC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. (BWMN) is 11.93%, while VSE Corporation (VSEC) has a volatility of 22.27%. This indicates that BWMN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VSEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BWMNVSECDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.93%

22.27%

-10.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.47%

45.79%

-14.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.96%

53.95%

-7.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

47.35%

46.13%

+1.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.03%

46.98%

+0.05%

Dividends

BWMN vs. VSEC - Dividend Comparison

BWMN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VSEC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BWMN
Bowman Consulting Group Ltd.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VSEC
VSE Corporation
0.22%0.23%0.42%0.77%0.85%0.59%0.94%0.89%1.00%0.54%0.51%0.68%

Financials

BWMN vs. VSEC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. and VSE Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M300.00M350.00M202220232024202520260
324.58M
(BWMN) Total Revenue
(VSEC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


BWMN and VSEC have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VSEC has higher volatility (22.27%) compared to BWMN (11.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BWMN dropped -56.21% vs VSEC's -76.09%.

VSEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.76 vs 0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BWMN and VSEC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer