BWLP vs. EMEQ
BWLP (BW LPG Limited) is a stock, while EMEQ (Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF) is Emerging Markets Diversified fund actively managed by Nomura. Over the past year, BWLP returned 74.65% vs 112.52% for EMEQ. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BWLP vs. EMEQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BWLP achieves a 69.76% return, which is significantly higher than EMEQ's 58.76% return.
BWLP
- 1D
- 2.29%
- 1M
- -6.55%
- 6M
- 62.09%
- YTD
- 69.76%
- 1Y
- 74.65%
- 3Y*
- 61.60%
- 5Y*
- 132.82%
- 10Y*
- 73.50%
EMEQ
- 1D
- -6.63%
- 1M
- -6.68%
- 6M
- 46.07%
- YTD
- 58.76%
- 1Y
- 112.52%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BWLP vs. EMEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BWLP BW LPG Limited | 69.76% | 29.04% | -18.48% |
EMEQ Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 58.76% | 69.78% | -0.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between BWLP and EMEQ is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2024 | 0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BWLP vs. EMEQ — Risk / Return Rank
BWLP
EMEQ
BWLP vs. EMEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BW LPG Limited (BWLP) and Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BWLP | EMEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.47 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.88 | 6.19 | -3.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.06 | 20.60 | -14.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BWLP vs. EMEQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BWLP drawdown since its inception was -68.80%, which is greater than EMEQ's maximum drawdown of -19.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BWLP and EMEQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BWLP | EMEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.80% | -19.99% | -48.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.04% | -18.29% | -7.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -54.28% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.28% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.80% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.55% | -18.29% | +11.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.63% | -4.22% | -16.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.37% | 5.48% | +6.89% |
Volatility
BWLP vs. EMEQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BW LPG Limited (BWLP) is 16.36%, while Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ) has a volatility of 19.40%. This indicates that BWLP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMEQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BWLP | EMEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.36% | 19.40% | -3.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.45% | 36.21% | -4.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.29% | 38.86% | +0.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 107.24% | 33.59% | +73.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 89.45% | 33.59% | +55.86% |
Dividends
BWLP vs. EMEQ - Dividend Comparison
BWLP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.48%, more than EMEQ's 1.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BWLP BW LPG Limited | 12.48% | 10.08% | 33.42% | 70.60% | 81.52% | 24.41% | 18.45% | 7.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 61.62% | 31.19% |
EMEQ Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 1.74% | 2.76% | 0.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BWLP and EMEQ have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EMEQ has higher volatility (19.40%) compared to BWLP (16.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BWLP dropped -68.80% vs EMEQ's -19.99%.
EMEQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BWLP and EMEQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer