PortfoliosLab logo
BWLP vs. WHF
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between BWLP and WHF is 0.07, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

BWLP vs. WHF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BW LPG Limited (BWLP) and WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. (WHF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BWLP:

-0.82

WHF:

-0.85

Sortino Ratio

BWLP:

-0.57

WHF:

-1.24

Omega Ratio

BWLP:

0.93

WHF:

0.85

Calmar Ratio

BWLP:

-0.55

WHF:

-0.85

Martin Ratio

BWLP:

-0.87

WHF:

-1.77

Ulcer Index

BWLP:

34.46%

WHF:

11.26%

Daily Std Dev

BWLP:

53.99%

WHF:

20.94%

Max Drawdown

BWLP:

-68.80%

WHF:

-57.48%

Current Drawdown

BWLP:

-42.31%

WHF:

-20.52%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BWLP:

$1.58B

WHF:

$208.96M

EPS

BWLP:

$1.87

WHF:

$0.39

PE Ratio

BWLP:

5.59

WHF:

23.05

PS Ratio

BWLP:

0.47

WHF:

2.43

PB Ratio

BWLP:

0.89

WHF:

0.74

Total Revenue (TTM)

BWLP:

$2.53B

WHF:

$70.56M

Gross Profit (TTM)

BWLP:

$386.48M

WHF:

$46.20M

EBITDA (TTM)

BWLP:

$436.43M

WHF:

$24.66M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BWLP achieves a -1.73% return, which is significantly higher than WHF's -3.50% return. Over the past 10 years, BWLP has outperformed WHF with an annualized return of 20.97%, while WHF has yielded a comparatively lower 8.70% annualized return.


BWLP

YTD

-1.73%

1M

6.33%

6M

-5.71%

1Y

-42.31%

3Y*

35.02%

5Y*

49.65%

10Y*

20.97%

WHF

YTD

-3.50%

1M

-5.86%

6M

-8.68%

1Y

-18.05%

3Y*

-2.00%

5Y*

11.32%

10Y*

8.70%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BW LPG Limited

WhiteHorse Finance, Inc.

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

BWLP vs. WHF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BWLP
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BWLP is 1919
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BWLP is 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BWLP is 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BWLP is 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BWLP is 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BWLP is 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

WHF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of WHF is 66
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of WHF is 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of WHF is 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of WHF is 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of WHF is 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of WHF is 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BWLP vs. WHF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BW LPG Limited (BWLP) and WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. (WHF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current BWLP Sharpe Ratio is -0.82, which is comparable to the WHF Sharpe Ratio of -0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BWLP and WHF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

BWLP vs. WHF - Dividend Comparison

BWLP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.81%, more than WHF's 19.86% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
BWLP
BW LPG Limited
25.81%25.53%20.47%12.15%13.09%13.93%5.04%0.00%0.00%37.71%22.98%10.64%
WHF
WhiteHorse Finance, Inc.
19.86%18.44%12.60%11.26%10.03%11.35%11.79%11.16%13.23%11.67%12.37%12.29%

Drawdowns

BWLP vs. WHF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BWLP drawdown since its inception was -68.80%, which is greater than WHF's maximum drawdown of -57.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BWLP and WHF.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

BWLP vs. WHF - Volatility Comparison

BW LPG Limited (BWLP) has a higher volatility of 14.57% compared to WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. (WHF) at 5.41%. This indicates that BWLP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WHF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

BWLP vs. WHF - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BW LPG Limited and WhiteHorse Finance, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00BJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025
843.75M
18.80M
(BWLP) Total Revenue
(WHF) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items