PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BWLP vs. OWL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BWLP vs. OWL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BW LPG Limited (BWLP) and Blue Owl Capital Inc. (OWL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BWLP achieves a 59.64% return, which is significantly higher than OWL's -35.51% return.


BWLP

1D
4.59%
1M
-8.86%
YTD
59.64%
6M
67.30%
1Y
81.21%
3Y*
57.28%
5Y*
124.66%
10Y*
69.64%

OWL

1D
-3.15%
1M
-8.25%
YTD
-35.51%
6M
-39.33%
1Y
-47.15%
3Y*
-1.02%
5Y*
-1.67%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BWLP vs. OWL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
BWLP
BW LPG Limited
59.64%29.04%0.32%770.27%272.29%3.97%-7.12%
OWL
Blue Owl Capital Inc.
-35.51%-32.83%61.76%47.40%-26.29%32.18%5.86%

Correlation

The correlation between BWLP and OWL is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2020

0.08

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BWLP:

$2.87B

OWL:

$6.29B

EPS

BWLP:

$2.39

OWL:

$0.13

PE Ratio

BWLP:

7.93

OWL:

71.02

PEG Ratio

BWLP:

0.41

OWL:

0.25

PS Ratio

BWLP:

0.80

OWL:

2.10

PB Ratio

BWLP:

1.50

OWL:

2.99

Total Revenue (TTM)

BWLP:

$3.59B

OWL:

$2.94B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BWLP:

$697.29M

OWL:

$1.99B

EBITDA (TTM)

BWLP:

$728.22M

OWL:

$876.72M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BWLP vs. OWL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BWLP
BWLP Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
BWLP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BWLP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
BWLP Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
BWLP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
BWLP Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

OWL
OWL Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
OWL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OWL Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
OWL Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
OWL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
OWL Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BWLP vs. OWL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BW LPG Limited (BWLP) and Blue Owl Capital Inc. (OWL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BWLPOWLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

0.81

+0.52

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.14

-0.81

+3.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.84

-1.38

+8.22

BWLP vs. OWL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BWLP Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is higher than the OWL Sharpe Ratio of -1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BWLP and OWL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BWLP vs. OWL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BWLP drawdown since its inception was -68.80%, roughly equal to the maximum OWL drawdown of -67.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BWLP and OWL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BWLPOWLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.80%

-67.10%

-1.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.04%

-58.59%

+32.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-54.28%

-67.10%

+12.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-54.28%

-67.10%

+12.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-68.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.12%

-62.23%

+50.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.67%

-24.27%

+3.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.91%

34.15%

-22.24%

Volatility

BWLP vs. OWL - Volatility Comparison

BW LPG Limited (BWLP) and Blue Owl Capital Inc. (OWL) have volatilities of 13.58% and 13.36%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BWLPOWLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.58%

13.36%

+0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.89%

34.70%

-4.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.29%

44.23%

-5.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

107.18%

42.08%

+65.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

89.51%

42.76%

+46.75%

Dividends

BWLP vs. OWL - Dividend Comparison

BWLP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.27%, more than OWL's 9.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BWLP
BW LPG Limited
13.27%10.08%33.42%70.60%81.52%24.41%18.45%7.70%0.00%0.00%61.62%31.19%
OWL
Blue Owl Capital Inc.
9.80%5.72%2.92%3.69%4.06%0.87%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

BWLP vs. OWL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BW LPG Limited and Blue Owl Capital Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
842.01M
753.81M
(BWLP) Total Revenue
(OWL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

BWLP vs. OWL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between BW LPG Limited and Blue Owl Capital Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
33.3%
100.0%
Portfolio components
BWLP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BW LPG Limited reported a gross profit of 280.57M and revenue of 842.01M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.3%.

OWL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Blue Owl Capital Inc. reported a gross profit of 753.81M and revenue of 753.81M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

BWLP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BW LPG Limited reported an operating income of 222.27M and revenue of 842.01M, resulting in an operating margin of 26.4%.

OWL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Blue Owl Capital Inc. reported an operating income of 109.49M and revenue of 753.81M, resulting in an operating margin of 14.5%.

BWLP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BW LPG Limited reported a net income of 164.89M and revenue of 842.01M, resulting in a net margin of 19.6%.

OWL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Blue Owl Capital Inc. reported a net income of 15.54M and revenue of 753.81M, resulting in a net margin of 2.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BWLP and OWL have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BWLP has higher volatility (13.58%) compared to OWL (13.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BWLP dropped -68.80% vs OWL's -67.10%.

BWLP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs -1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BWLP and OWL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer