PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BWET vs. SGDJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BWET vs. SGDJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET) and Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF (SGDJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BWET achieves a 1,246.34% return, which is significantly higher than SGDJ's -9.52% return.


BWET

1D
-3.40%
1M
52.08%
6M
619.27%
YTD
1,246.34%
1Y
2,150.47%
3Y*
135.18%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
144.54%

SGDJ

1D
4.19%
1M
-2.98%
6M
-18.78%
YTD
-9.52%
1Y
70.50%
3Y*
47.29%
5Y*
16.55%
10Y*
8.03%
ALL TIME*
13.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$45.42M$38.94M$29.75M
$3.49M$3.45M$5.08M

BWET vs. SGDJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BWET
Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF
1,246.34%96.22%-39.21%14.13%
SGDJ
Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF
-9.52%174.44%19.35%-8.72%

Correlation

The correlation between BWET and SGDJ is -0.11, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2023

0.00

The correlation between BWET and SGDJ shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.01 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BWET vs. SGDJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BWET
BWET Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
BWET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BWET Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
BWET Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
BWET Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
BWET Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

SGDJ
SGDJ Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
SGDJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGDJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGDJ Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
SGDJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGDJ Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BWET vs. SGDJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET) and Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF (SGDJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BWETSGDJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+18.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.91

1.24

+0.68

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

52.86

1.87

+50.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

198.46

3.88

+194.58

BWET vs. SGDJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BWET Sharpe Ratio is 20.19, which is higher than the SGDJ Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BWET and SGDJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BWET vs. SGDJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BWET drawdown since its inception was -56.90%, roughly equal to the maximum SGDJ drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BWET and SGDJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BWETSGDJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.90%

-59.27%

+2.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-41.22%

-37.98%

-3.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-56.81%

-37.98%

-18.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.40%

-34.03%

+30.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.38%

-26.34%

+2.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.96%

18.22%

-7.26%

Volatility

BWET vs. SGDJ - Volatility Comparison

Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET) has a higher volatility of 31.04% compared to Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF (SGDJ) at 13.95%. This indicates that BWET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SGDJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BWETSGDJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

31.04%

13.95%

+17.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

95.74%

40.00%

+55.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

108.15%

52.51%

+55.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

74.45%

41.32%

+33.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

74.45%

40.93%

+33.52%

BWET vs. SGDJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BWET has a 3.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SGDJ's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

BWET vs. SGDJ - Dividend Comparison

BWET has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SGDJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.25%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BWET
Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SGDJ
Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF
9.25%8.37%6.55%4.55%2.46%2.20%1.97%0.65%0.00%0.14%1.77%0.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


BWET and SGDJ have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BWET has higher volatility (31.04%) compared to SGDJ (13.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BWET dropped -56.90% vs SGDJ's -59.27%.

On 3-year performance, BWET leads with 135.18% vs 47.29% for SGDJ. On fees, SGDJ is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, SGDJ has been the lower-risk option at 13.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, BWET has performed better with a 135.18% return vs 47.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SGDJ is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 3.50% for BWET.

SGDJ has the higher dividend yield at 9.25%, compared with 0.00% for BWET.

BWET is categorized as Commodities, while SGDJ is Gold. BWET tracks Breakwave Wet Freight Futures Index, while SGDJ tracks Solactive Junior Gold Miners Custom Factors Index. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Sprott. Their fees differ too: 3.50% for BWET and 0.50% for SGDJ.

BWET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (20.19 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BWET and SGDJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer