BWET vs. SCUS

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

BWET (Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF) and SCUS (Schwab Ultra-Short Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BWET is a Commodities fund tracking the Breakwave Wet Freight Futures Index, while SCUS is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Charles Schwab. BWET is passively managed, while SCUS is actively managed. Over the past year, BWET returned 1640.62% vs 3.94% for SCUS. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. BWET charges 3.50%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for SCUS.

Performance

BWET vs. SCUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET) and Schwab Ultra-Short Income ETF (SCUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BWET achieves a 1,030.31% return, which is significantly higher than SCUS's 1.49% return.

BWET

• 1D: 2.73%
• 1M: 25.30%
• YTD: 1,030.31%
• 6M: 892.97%
• 1Y: 1,640.62%
• 3Y*: 128.11%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SCUS

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 0.18%
• YTD: 1.49%
• 6M: 1.61%
• 1Y: 3.94%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BWET vs. SCUS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF	1,030.31%	96.22%	-32.94%
SCUS Schwab Ultra-Short Income ETF	1.49%	4.51%	2.00%

Correlation

The correlation between BWET and SCUS is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.15
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 13, 2024	-0.07

Return for Risk

BWET vs. SCUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BWET

BWET Risk / Return Rank: 98
BWET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
BWET Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
BWET Omega Ratio Rank: 97
BWET Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
BWET Martin Ratio Rank: 99

SCUS

SCUS Risk / Return Rank: 99
SCUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
SCUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
SCUS Omega Ratio Rank: 98
SCUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
SCUS Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BWET vs. SCUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET) and Schwab Ultra-Short Income ETF (SCUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BWET	SCUS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	16.89	5.84	+11.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	6.36	11.18	-4.82
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.92	2.56	-0.64
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	54.19	23.76	+30.44
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	142.88	102.91	+39.97

BWET vs. SCUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BWET Sharpe Ratio is 16.89, which is higher than the SCUS Sharpe Ratio of 5.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BWET and SCUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BWET vs. SCUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BWET drawdown since its inception was -56.90%, which is greater than SCUS's maximum drawdown of -0.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BWET and SCUS.

Drawdown Indicators

	BWET	SCUS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.90%	-0.17%	-56.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-30.64%	-0.17%	-30.47%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-56.81%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.08%	+0.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.78%	-0.02%	-23.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.60%	0.04%	+11.56%

Volatility

BWET vs. SCUS - Volatility Comparison

Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET) has a higher volatility of 25.51% compared to Schwab Ultra-Short Income ETF (SCUS) at 0.22%. This indicates that BWET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BWET	SCUS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	25.51%	0.22%	+25.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	88.96%	0.50%	+88.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	98.53%	0.68%	+97.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	70.43%	0.71%	+69.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	70.43%	0.71%	+69.72%

BWET vs. SCUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

BWET has a 3.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SCUS's 0.14% expense ratio.

Dividends

BWET vs. SCUS - Dividend Comparison

BWET has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.91%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SCUS Schwab Ultra-Short Income ETF	3.91%	4.17%	1.62%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BWET and SCUS in my portfolio?

BWET and SCUS have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BWET or SCUS?

BWET has higher volatility (25.51%) compared to SCUS (0.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BWET dropped -56.90% vs SCUS's -0.17%.

Which ETF is better, BWET or SCUS?

On 1-year performance, BWET leads with 1640.62% vs 3.94% for SCUS. On fees, SCUS is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, SCUS has been the lower-risk option at 0.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BWET or SCUS?

Over the 1-year period, BWET has performed better with a 1640.62% return vs 3.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BWET or SCUS?

SCUS is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 3.50% for BWET.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BWET or SCUS?

SCUS has the higher dividend yield at 3.91%, compared with 0.00% for BWET.

What is the main difference between BWET and SCUS?

BWET is categorized as Commodities, while SCUS is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 3.50% for BWET and 0.14% for SCUS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BWET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (16.89 vs 5.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.