BWET vs. PULT

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

BWET (Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF) and PULT (Putnam ESG Ultra Short ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BWET is a Commodities fund tracking the Breakwave Wet Freight Futures Index, while PULT is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Putnam. BWET is passively managed, while PULT is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, BWET returned 128.11%/yr vs 5.32%/yr for PULT. At a correlation of -0.10, they often move in opposite directions. BWET charges 3.50%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for PULT.

Performance

BWET vs. PULT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET) and Putnam ESG Ultra Short ETF (PULT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BWET achieves a 1,030.31% return, which is significantly higher than PULT's 1.23% return.

BWET

• 1D: 2.73%
• 1M: 25.30%
• YTD: 1,030.31%
• 6M: 892.97%
• 1Y: 1,640.62%
• 3Y*: 128.11%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PULT

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.12%
• YTD: 1.23%
• 6M: 1.38%
• 1Y: 3.98%
• 3Y*: 5.32%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BWET vs. PULT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF	1,030.31%	96.22%	-39.21%	14.13%
PULT Putnam ESG Ultra Short ETF	1.23%	5.08%	5.93%	4.28%

Correlation

The correlation between BWET and PULT is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.16
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.10
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2023	-0.10

Return for Risk

BWET vs. PULT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BWET

BWET Risk / Return Rank: 98
BWET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
BWET Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
BWET Omega Ratio Rank: 97
BWET Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
BWET Martin Ratio Rank: 99

PULT

PULT Risk / Return Rank: 98
PULT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
PULT Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
PULT Omega Ratio Rank: 99
PULT Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
PULT Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BWET vs. PULT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET) and Putnam ESG Ultra Short ETF (PULT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BWET	PULT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	16.89	5.45	+11.43
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	6.36	9.72	-3.36
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.92	2.96	-1.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	54.19	9.67	+44.52
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	142.88	70.25	+72.63

BWET vs. PULT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BWET Sharpe Ratio is 16.89, which is higher than the PULT Sharpe Ratio of 5.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BWET and PULT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BWET vs. PULT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BWET drawdown since its inception was -56.90%, which is greater than PULT's maximum drawdown of -0.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BWET and PULT.

Drawdown Indicators

	BWET	PULT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.90%	-0.43%	-56.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-30.64%	-0.43%	-30.21%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-56.81%	-0.43%	-56.38%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.29%	+0.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.78%	-0.02%	-23.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.60%	0.06%	+11.54%

Volatility

BWET vs. PULT - Volatility Comparison

Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET) has a higher volatility of 25.51% compared to Putnam ESG Ultra Short ETF (PULT) at 0.55%. This indicates that BWET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PULT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BWET	PULT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	25.51%	0.55%	+24.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	88.96%	0.64%	+88.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	98.53%	0.77%	+97.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	70.43%	0.64%	+69.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	70.43%	0.64%	+69.79%

BWET vs. PULT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BWET has a 3.50% expense ratio, which is higher than PULT's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

BWET vs. PULT - Dividend Comparison

BWET has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PULT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.25%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PULT Putnam ESG Ultra Short ETF	4.25%	4.59%	5.38%	4.88%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BWET and PULT in my portfolio?

BWET and PULT have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BWET or PULT?

BWET has higher volatility (25.51%) compared to PULT (0.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BWET dropped -56.90% vs PULT's -0.43%.

Which ETF is better, BWET or PULT?

On 3-year performance, BWET leads with 128.11% vs 5.32% for PULT. On fees, PULT is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, PULT has been the lower-risk option at 0.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BWET or PULT?

Over the 3-year period, BWET has performed better with a 128.11% return vs 5.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BWET or PULT?

PULT is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 3.50% for BWET.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BWET or PULT?

PULT has the higher dividend yield at 4.25%, compared with 0.00% for BWET.

What is the main difference between BWET and PULT?

BWET is categorized as Commodities, while PULT is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Putnam. Their fees differ too: 3.50% for BWET and 0.25% for PULT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BWET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (16.89 vs 5.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.