PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BWET vs. GSG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BWET vs. GSG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET) and iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BWET vs. GSG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BWET
Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF
411.30%96.22%-39.21%15.94%
GSG
iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust
39.85%5.93%8.52%7.33%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BWET achieves a 411.30% return, which is significantly higher than GSG's 39.85% return.


BWET

1D
-19.47%
1M
71.90%
YTD
411.30%
6M
568.02%
1Y
802.84%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GSG

1D
-1.01%
1M
24.23%
YTD
39.85%
6M
40.40%
1Y
41.63%
3Y*
17.03%
5Y*
17.93%
10Y*
9.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BWET vs. GSG - Expense Ratio Comparison

BWET has a 3.50% expense ratio, which is higher than GSG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BWET vs. GSG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BWET
BWET Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
BWET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BWET Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
BWET Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
BWET Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
BWET Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

GSG
GSG Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
GSG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSG Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
GSG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSG Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BWET vs. GSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET) and iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BWETGSGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

9.77

1.98

+7.79

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

5.78

2.66

+3.11

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.86

1.36

+0.50

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

27.62

3.70

+23.93

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

78.05

10.32

+67.73

BWET vs. GSG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BWET Sharpe Ratio is 9.77, which is higher than the GSG Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BWET and GSG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BWETGSGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.77

1.98

+7.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.50

-0.09

+1.59

Correlation

The correlation between BWET and GSG is 0.02, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

BWET vs. GSG - Dividend Comparison

Neither BWET nor GSG has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

BWET vs. GSG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BWET drawdown since its inception was -56.90%, smaller than the maximum GSG drawdown of -89.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BWET and GSG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BWETGSGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.90%

-89.62%

+32.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.84%

-11.91%

-16.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.47%

-57.78%

+38.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.74%

-63.77%

+39.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.21%

4.27%

+5.94%

Volatility

BWET vs. GSG - Volatility Comparison

Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET) has a higher volatility of 51.89% compared to iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG) at 11.08%. This indicates that BWET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BWETGSGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

51.89%

11.08%

+40.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

72.97%

16.24%

+56.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

83.00%

21.16%

+61.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

64.49%

21.97%

+42.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

64.49%

21.78%

+42.71%